It would appear, and as reported, in the light of recent figures suggesting that over 60% of Germans feel that Islam has no place in Germany, the open border immigration policies that Angela Merkel’s government drove home to Germans last autumn have started to have their obvious and predictable consequences.

Obvious and predictable to all but her it would seem. Now she is furiously back peddling as she realizes that her drunken policies might not only destroy her country, but also her career.

With her country’s political landscape shifting significantly before her, Angela Merkel has now put her political hat on in order to survive politically in Germany.

As France 24 reports, Angela Merkel is urging European Leaders to protect the EU’s external borders or risk a “return to nationalism.” Merkel said the “freedom of movement” in Europe is at stake as it deals with the worst migration crisis since WWII.

Read Full Article

And it does pose the very valid question: If other people could see the folly of last summer’s open door policy, why weren’t those with infinitely greater resources and knowledge aware of the mistakes they were making at the time?

Without question, back-peddling on such a serious failure should be viewed with nothing but contempt. Of course she should pay with her political career, but given the culturally invasive nature of the seeds they have sown, leaders like Angela Merkel, Francois Hollande & the E.U. policy commissioners – who continue to coerce sovereign nations into taking refugee quotas they do not want – should now be looking in the rear view mirror for charges of treason appearing on the horizon.

You could say that Jeremy Corbyn’s Old Labour are a victim of their own leftist logic. This week life long member and activist, Ken Livingstone was suspended after having the temerity to say that Hitler was a Zionist who supported a Jewish state in Palestine. Now you would have thought that anyone wanting to clear this up, could spend 15 minutes researching as to whether this statement is correct or not, before embarking upon a campaign to have the member removed from his post.

Read Full Story

It turns out that Livingstone is correct to at least some degree, Adolf Hitler’s government did establish the Haavara Agreement in 1933 with Zionist German Jews to help resettle German Jews in Palestine. Read More

But none of this seems to matter, as the guardians of the progressive narrative have demonstrated time and time again in recent years – the truth does not matter; perception is everything. In short, it’s the sort of logic defying stunt that the liberal left pull on a daily basis. Only this time, the victim is one of their own.

Does this mean that the British Labour Party is not anti- Semetic? Don’t be silly, the left in Britain is riven with an anti-Semitism that borders upon systemic, but the source of that anti-Semetism has its roots firmly elsewhere – in it’s cosy alliance with Hamas over the Palestinian issue; as illustrated earlier last week with the expulsion of another Labour Party MP, Naz Shah, who suggested on social media that the state of Israel should be dismantled & relocated to the U.S. Midwest. Read More  and More

In sober moments, those on the the left in Britain will tell you that their issue is not with the Jewish people, but with the state of Israel and Zionism. However that is clearly not how their allies in this cause – the growing and increasingly militant British Muslim population see it. And together with their brothers and sisters in France, Belgium and Germany, they are almost singlehandedly once again making Europe a dangerous place to be Jewish.

A new study published by the Institute for the Study of Global Anti-Semitism and Policy (ISGAP) confirms what many have long suspected: that the worst crimes against Jews in Europe are perpetrated by (European) Muslims, and that Muslims have been responsible for a “disproportionate” number of anti-Semitic attacks over the past 15 years.

Read Full Report

 

There have been a couple of big international stories over the past week that should have had both feminists & the LGBT community up off their seats in rage.

The first was a story about 250 women that were executed for refusing to become ISIS sex slaves. You know how bent out of shape feminists get over things like man spreading and the patriarchy; everyone knows, they lose their shit! So you would have thought given the severity of this crime against women, that feminist across the globe would outraged by the execution of 250 sisters for refusing to be sex slaves. Apparently not.

Then a few days later, another story, that this time should have had the LGBT community out of their seats in rage: two men hackled to bits by ISIS militants in Bangladesh for being gay. You know how the LGBT community blows its stack over things like gender neutral bathrooms and gay wedding cakes baked by Christians, they lose their shit! So you would have thought that the brutal murder of two gay men in an intolerant oppressive nation for religious reasons would have had them making human chains outside the embassy. Again, not so.

What is it about these two cases that differs from the relatively pedestrian domestic issues of gay cakes & man spreading? It’s race.

Liberal racism is one of the most  perverse forms of racism out there. It basically works like this: We can’t criticize mass murders by Muslims because Muslims are generally brown. People of darker skin are not to be criticized or held to the same standard of expectation because of their politically correct high caste status.

It is also why professional liberals can indulge in that most entertaining of aggregate fallacies – support for Islam & feminism. Which is the ideological equivalent of being secretly married to two people who live in the same street – one day it’s going to get very messy.

But when you control the narrative, you can afford to live in a world of such megalithic inconsistencies. No one is going to point them out, and if they do, you can silence them by calling privilege or racism.

The global elite must be really worried, worried enough to pull out the really big guns. There’ve been a but handful of times over the past few years when they have been so concerned that they have called in big players for photo calls and to deliver Op-eds in national newspapers to engage in an exercise that could only be described as desperate propaganda.

This time, with the possibility of a British exit from the E.U. (Brexit) on the cards during the looming June referendum, it fell to no other than Barrack Obama to address the readership of one of Britain’s divided newspapers on the issue, the Daily Telegraph.

“The United Kingdom remains a friend and ally to the United States like no other. Our special relationship was forged as we spilt blood together on the battlefield. It was fortified as we built and sustained the architecture for advancing stability and prosperity in Europe, and our democratic values around the globe.”

This from the man who removed the bust of Winston Churchill upon his arrival at the Whitehouse.

He went on,“The European Union doesn’t moderate British influence – it magnifies it. A strong Europe is not a threat to Britain’s global leadership; it enhances Britain’s global leadership. The United States sees how your powerful voice in Europe ensures that Europe takes a strong stance in the world, and keeps the EU open, outward looking, and closely linked to its allies on the other side of the Atlantic. So the U.S. and the world need your outsized influence to continue – including within Europe.”

Read Full Address

It is quite clear that the people who pull Obama’s strings have a very vested interest in the Euro Superstate dream not coming apart at the seams, starting with a Brexit that would have a domino effect leading to other nations also leaping from the sinking ship.

If you are wondering when else the panicked elites stooped to such desperation, most recently there was George Soros’s Op-ed piece in the Guardian in the wake of the November Paris attacks encouraging everyone not to give in to fear and continue faithfully with the progressive program of mass immigration from the Islamic world.  Full Article

And previous to that it consisted of a perfectly timed visit by none other than the Queen of England to the London Bullion Markets Association (LBMA) vaults,  just days after reports and rumours circulated in industry press that the vaults were virtually empty.

Some people support Hillary because she is a woman; others because she’s a progressive democrat. Some people hate Trump so much they would rather hand their futures to someone who has quite possibly eaten a baby.

When it comes to Hillary Clinton we believe that we have maintained a fairly consistent stance. To borrow from Bill Hicks, it’s not that we disagree with her foreign policy or her domestic policy; it’s that we believe she is a child of Satan here to destroy planet earth.

Let us just stick that flag firmly in the ground, so there is no chance of any misunderstanding in the future.

If any candidate fits the shape-shifting world of David Icke’s Reptilian elites, it’s Hillary – a candidate from a political dynasty with rap sheet that reads like an inner city gang banger.

This week Lew Rockwell, chairman of the Ludwig Von Mises Institute branded Clinton ‘the most dangerous candidate of those running from a war standpoint.’

Read Full Article

Hillary Clinton is a Deep State candidate, which means that more than any other candidate, yes even Ted Cruz, she is in the pocket of nefarious players who will continue to take us down the path towards war with Russia. Who by the way, if you hadn’t noticed, isn’t the real enemy here.

 

 

Snoop Dogg took time out of his busy schedule this week during a visit to Vancouver to let everyone know what he thought of that most hallowed of liberal causes, the Downtown Eastside.

Obviously no one had informed Snoop that there is nothing more ‘authentic’ than poverty, and that the topic is off bounds unless you are taking about how the area is in danger of being ‘ruined’ by evil developers who would not think twice about destroying one of the most ‘vibrant’ gems of real Vancouver.

But that’s not how Snoop saw it, because people who know anything about poverty & depravation usually don’t see it that way.

“I can’t believe these muthafuckers sweatin’ me at the fucking border and they got an alleyway where they pass out needles for people to do heroin at… Y’all need to raise up off me Canada.. You need to clean this shit up out here; this is terrible bro.”

Read Full Article

Oh come on Snoop, it’s real and authentic, and needs to be protected so that insecure liberals can assuage the guilt of their media careers and $3000 bicycle with one gear.

Anyway, I’m sure they said the same thing about London’s Gin Lane in 1730’s – also very ‘authentic.’