Practical Masculinity: Grayson Vs Grylls


Turner prize-winning & cross-dressing artist, Grayson Perry has questioned the practical masculine skills of TV survival expert Bear Grylls.

“He celebrates a masculinity that is useless,” Perry said. “Try going into an estate agent in Finsbury Park and come out with an affordable flat. I want to see Bear Grylls looking for a decent state school for his child!”

Read Full Article and More

We have no doubt that the ex-special forces Grylls would fair better than most, and possibly Perry himself, in navigating  the perilous challenge of dealing with an estate agent and finding an affordable flat in Finsbury Park or decent state school for his child – The Horror!


Given the nature and severity of the challenges Bear Grylls already successfully has under his belt, Perry’s comments should seem ludicrous to all but those inside the camp (pun intended) of the campaign to deconstruct masculinity and render all modern men as nothing more than whining man-bitches clinging to safe spaces and banging the nauseating drum of empathetic feminism.

It would be much more entertaining to see Perry try and build a fire out of twigs and teabags, or survive adrift at sea without lipstick and a nail file. You know, real skills.

Grylls’ response: ‘In the wild, quiet courage, humility, persistence and selflessness makes a man and also a woman. That is never outdated.’

Where’s the Rage? All You Can Hear Is Crickets



There have been a couple of big international stories over the past week that should have had both feminists & the LGBT community up off their seats in rage.

The first was a story about 250 women that were executed for refusing to become ISIS sex slaves. You know how bent out of shape feminists get over things like man spreading and the patriarchy; everyone knows, they lose their shit! So you would have thought given the severity of this crime against women, that feminist across the globe would outraged by the execution of 250 sisters for refusing to be sex slaves. Apparently not.

Then a few days later, another story, that this time should have had the LGBT community out of their seats in rage: two men hackled to bits by ISIS militants in Bangladesh for being gay. You know how the LGBT community blows its stack over things like gender neutral bathrooms and gay wedding cakes baked by Christians, they lose their shit! So you would have thought that the brutal murder of two gay men in an intolerant oppressive nation for religious reasons would have had them making human chains outside the embassy. Again, not so.

What is it about these two cases that differs from the relatively pedestrian domestic issues of gay cakes & man spreading? It’s race.

Liberal racism is one of the most  perverse forms of racism out there. It basically works like this: We can’t criticize mass murders by Muslims because Muslims are generally brown. People of darker skin are not to be criticized or held to the same standard of expectation because of their politically correct high caste status.

It is also why professional liberals can indulge in that most entertaining of aggregate fallacies – support for Islam & feminism. Which is the ideological equivalent of being secretly married to two people who live in the same street – one day it’s going to get very messy.

But when you control the narrative, you can afford to live in a world of such megalithic inconsistencies. No one is going to point them out, and if they do, you can silence them by calling privilege or racism.

Seymour Hersh: Saudis Paid Pakistan To Hold Bin Laden


Yet another revelation from award winning U.S. investigative journalist, Seymour Hersh. You might remember some months ago Hersh exposed the fact that U.S. military commanders frustrated with the Obama administration’s lack of action on ISIS, started sharing intel with Bashar Al Assad’s government. Read More He could not get a mainstream U.S. news outlet to run with the piece.

Full Article Here

Now Hersh claims that the Saudi government paid Pakistan to keep Bin Laden so that he could not be interrogated by the U.S. Here is an extract from his interview with Ken Klippenstein of AlterNet. Read Full Story

KK: So you don’t know if the hush money was from the Saudi government or private individuals?

SH: The money was from the government … what the Saudis were doing, so I’ve been told, by reasonable people (I haven’t written this) is that they were also passing along tankers of oil for the Pakistanis to resell. That’s really a lot of money.

KK: For the Bin Laden compound?

SH: Yeah, in exchange for being quiet. 

KK: Do you have any idea how much Saudi Arabia gave Pakistan in hush money?

SH: I have been given numbers, but I haven’t done the work on it so I’m just relaying. I know it was certainly many—you know, we’re talking about four or five years—hundreds of millions [of dollars]. But I don’t have enough to tell you.

KK: Why didn’t they apprehend Bin Laden? Can you imagine the intelligence we could have gotten from him?

SH: The Pakistani high command said go kill him, but for chrissake don’t leave a body, don’t arrest him, just tell them a week later that you killed him in Hindu Kush. That was the plan. 

Canadian Immigration Idol


In the light of recent security concerns regarding the arrival of large numbers of Syrians, and the revelation that most of the 25,000 who recently arrived in Canada were not actually from refugee camps as claimed by the Prime minister’s office, but consisted mainly of Syrians already living in Turkey with jobs & apartments etc.,  Minister for Citizenship & Immigration, John McCallum announced this week that Canada was working on a dramatic overhaul in its current immigration program, which would seek to draw immigrants from cultures with good international reputations whilst restricting the entry of others.

The new system, he claimed, would also make the selection process much more democratic, giving the public a direct say on who comes into the country.

Under the controversial hip new Liberal plans, each province will have to announce their immigration quota for the following year, that quota is then put to a series of live public votes on CBC at primetime on Saturday evenings at 8pm (9pm in Newfoundland). Viewers will be given the opportunity to split their vote between 5 recipient nations or groups within those nations, in what is being described by some as Reality Immigration.

“It will be like a cultural popularity contest.” McCallum said. “Everyone accepts that Immigration is required to fill the gaps left by an aging population. Western first world secular societies do not produce enough children to service and sustain their increasingly narcissistic godless societies. Immigration is a must for Canada; it’s the specifics of selection that we wish improve and involve the public in. We believe that if the public can get involved then it will make the process more democratic, and make the new Liberal government look even more cool & trendy.”

Leader of the opposition, Rona Ambrose has already slammed the proposed changes as an immature popularity contest – a “Pop idol immigration policy.”

Needless to say, religion and cultural are set to play a huge part, and Mr McCallum admitted that the new policy approach may possess the added bonus of tackling some of the potentially problematic cultural characteristics which tend to come with new arrivals to Canada.

“Let’s say that you are living in the tribal lands of north west Pakistan and you are thinking about beheading a teacher who has been teaching girls to read and write. Well, you might think twice about it if you thought that it might harm your children’s chances of making a new life in Mississauga… Or let’s say your wife left you and you want to punish her by throwing acid in her face… again, you might deicide not to do it if you know that it might affect your application for Canadian permanent residence at some later date. Not only that, but the people of Canada will have a democratic say in who comes into the country, plus it will improve CBC’s Saturday evening programming, finally providing viewers with something that they actually want to watch. It really is a win, win, win situation for everyone.”

As McCallum suggested, the big losers in this new policy shift are predicted to be traditional Islamic cultures and anywhere else there’s a propensity is to be a bit of a bad cunt when no one is is looking. We put this to him that making immigration a popularity contest would be implicitly anti-Islamic.

“It’s a democratic vote.” McCallum said. “But let’s face it, why would the population of, say, Manitoba opt for a 7th Century Sharia Horse brimming with disobedient daughter slaying, book burning and public beheadings, when they could opt some nice friendly Filipinos or Mexicans instead? Are those people racists for making such a clear & obviously sane decision? This is Canada, and the customer is nearly always right! Maybe they don’t buy because they don’t like the product on offer, and so countries and cultures will need to clean up their act… Under the current system we choose the fruit for the customer and tell them to like it. This way the public gets to choose. Don’t like bananas? Fine, have an apple.”

The programme is scheduled to begin next spring.

What British Muslims Really Think

On the back of Ben Shapiro’s The Myth of a Tiny Radical Minority, the former head of the U.K’s Equality and Human Rights Commission, Trevor Phillips, who was responsible for introducing the term Islamophobia to Britain 20 years ago, has together with Channel 4 produced a documentary detailing research undertaken into what British Muslims really think.

To say that the once guardian of liberalism, Phillips has done an about turn in political terms, would be an understatement.

As Douglas Murray in the Spectator comments:

The Phillips piece is most important for what he himself admits. Among other things Phillips confesses that Britain has for years been telling itself a lie in relation to its Muslim populations – not least in pretending that they will blend in just like everyone else.  Read More

The Guardian went into anaphylactic shock, as it increasingly does nowadays when faced with the harsh realities of Islam, and found amongst other thing, five muslims who didn’t like the programme willing to give it a 0-5 rating. Enjoy

All joking aside, it is essential sober viewing from Phillips, the progressive equivalent of the former persecutor of Christians formerly known as Saul.


Have I Told You How Special You Are Lately?


The global elite must be really worried, worried enough to pull out the really big guns. There’ve been a but handful of times over the past few years when they have been so concerned that they have called in big players for photo calls and to deliver Op-eds in national newspapers to engage in an exercise that could only be described as desperate propaganda.

This time, with the possibility of a British exit from the E.U. (Brexit) on the cards during the looming June referendum, it fell to no other than Barrack Obama to address the readership of one of Britain’s divided newspapers on the issue, the Daily Telegraph.

“The United Kingdom remains a friend and ally to the United States like no other. Our special relationship was forged as we spilt blood together on the battlefield. It was fortified as we built and sustained the architecture for advancing stability and prosperity in Europe, and our democratic values around the globe.”

This from the man who removed the bust of Winston Churchill upon his arrival at the Whitehouse.

He went on,“The European Union doesn’t moderate British influence – it magnifies it. A strong Europe is not a threat to Britain’s global leadership; it enhances Britain’s global leadership. The United States sees how your powerful voice in Europe ensures that Europe takes a strong stance in the world, and keeps the EU open, outward looking, and closely linked to its allies on the other side of the Atlantic. So the U.S. and the world need your outsized influence to continue – including within Europe.”

Read Full Address

It is quite clear that the people who pull Obama’s strings have a very vested interest in the Euro Superstate dream not coming apart at the seams, starting with a Brexit that would have a domino effect leading to other nations also leaping from the sinking ship.

If you are wondering when else the panicked elites stooped to such desperation, most recently there was George Soros’s Op-ed piece in the Guardian in the wake of the November Paris attacks encouraging everyone not to give in to fear and continue faithfully with the progressive program of mass immigration from the Islamic world.  Full Article

And previous to that it consisted of a perfectly timed visit by none other than the Queen of England to the London Bullion Markets Association (LBMA) vaults,  just days after reports and rumours circulated in industry press that the vaults were virtually empty.

A Vote for Hillary Is A Vote for War with Russia.


Some people support Hillary because she is a woman; others because she’s a progressive democrat. Some people hate Trump so much they would rather hand their futures to someone who has quite possibly eaten a baby.

When it comes to Hillary Clinton we believe that we have maintained a fairly consistent stance. To borrow from Bill Hicks, it’s not that we disagree with her foreign policy or her domestic policy; it’s that we believe she is a child of Satan here to destroy planet earth.


Let us just stick that flag firmly in the ground, so there is no chance of any misunderstanding in the future.

If any candidate fits the shape-shifting world of David Icke’s Reptilian elites, it’s Hillary – a candidate from a political dynasty with rap sheet that reads like an inner city gang banger.

This week Lew Rockwell, chairman of the Ludwig Von Mises Institute branded Clinton ‘the most dangerous candidate of those running from a war standpoint.’

Read Full Article

Hillary Clinton is a Deep State candidate, which means that more than any other candidate, yes even Ted Cruz, she is in the pocket of nefarious players who will continue to take us down the path towards war with Russia. Who by the way, if you hadn’t noticed, isn’t the real enemy here.



Gin Lane, Vancouver 2016


Snoop Dogg took time out of his busy schedule this week during a visit to Vancouver to let everyone know what he thought of that most hallowed of liberal causes, the Downtown Eastside.

Obviously no one had informed Snoop that there is nothing more ‘authentic’ than poverty, and that the topic is off bounds unless you are taking about how the area is in danger of being ‘ruined’ by evil developers who would not think twice about destroying one of the most ‘vibrant’ gems of real Vancouver.

But that’s not how Snoop saw it, because people who know anything about poverty & depravation usually don’t see it that way.

“I can’t believe these muthafuckers sweatin’ me at the fucking border and they got an alleyway where they pass out needles for people to do heroin at… Y’all need to raise up off me Canada.. You need to clean this shit up out here; this is terrible bro.”

Read Full Article

Oh come on Snoop, it’s real and authentic, and needs to be protected so that insecure liberals can assuage the guilt of their media careers and $3000 bicycle with one gear.

Anyway, I’m sure they said the same thing about London’s Gin Lane in 1730’s – also very ‘authentic.’



The Deep State and Saudi Arabia Behind 9/11


As suspected for some time, and thoroughly detailed in Crossing the Rubicon by ex-police officer and investigative journalist, Michael C. Ruppert before his death, there were two main players behind the 9/11 attacks – the Deep State (elements within the U.S. government including corporate; financial interests & CIA) and axis of Islamic evil & exporter of Wahabbist ideology, Saudi Arabia.

Given the depth & detail of Ruppert’s 528 page publication, it seems incredible that we are still searching for the answers to the mysteries of 9/11, but hey, who can be bothered reading 528 pages of detailed investigation nowadays? We can thank social media for that.

Now it would see that not all is well in the House of Saud & Deep State bed chamber, as it has emerged that the Saudis have threatened to dump $750 billion of U.S. treasuries if congress amends a bill allowing the pursuit of foreign nations responsible for terror attacks that kill Americans on U.S. soil, which they fear could implicate Saudi state involvement in the attacks which killed over 3000 people.

Under the current US law, foreign nations have a degree of immunity from being sued in American courts. The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 is one of the reasons why families of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks largely failed to bring to court the Saudi royal family and charities over suspicion of financially supporting the attacks.

The bill introduced in the Senate would waiver the immunity for cases involving terrorist attacks that kill US citizens on US soil.

Possible links between the perpetrators of the attack and Saudi Arabia may be hiding in 28 classified pages of the 2002 congressional report on 9/11, which allegedly describe how Saudi Arabian nationals with links to the government financially assisted the 19 hijackers who flew airplanes into World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Many people, including the co-author of the redacted pages, former Florida Senator Bob Graham, have been campaigning for years to make them public.

Read Full Article

Samsung’s ‘Clockwork Orange’


Forget smart glasses: Samsung has been granted a patent for contact lenses that project images directly into the eye.

The patent, awarded in South Korea, includes a contact lens equipped with a display, a camera, an antenna, and several sensors that detect movement.

The contact lens will use the antenna to link up to a smartphone, which processes the image sent into the eyes.

Read Full Article Here