Macron: Globalist Errand Boy

After the first round of voting in the French Presidential election on Sunday, two candidates emerged as favourites to win the run off on 7th May, and the choice could not be more stark for French voters.

In what is emerging as the next battle ground between in the ongoing war between the forces of nationalim & globalism, right wing nationalist, Marine Le Pen is now battling for the future of France with pro E.U. globalist errand boy, Emmanuel Macron.

Marine has only one extremely long shot on May 7. She will be frantically touring “deep France” to turn the second round into a debate on French identity and a clash of nationalists, patriots and sovereignists against pro-EU globalists and urban “liquid modernity” practitioners.

Europe is at the heart of the Marine vs Macron fight; that’s Frexit against a “new European project.”

Everyone in Brussels “voted” Macron as he proposes a budget for the eurozone, a dedicated Parliament, and a dedicated Minister of Finance. In short; Brussels on steroids. Read More

Like Britain and the U.S. before her, France now faces a democratic choice between two dramatically different futures. It’s fair to say that most people are familiar with Le Pen, her politics and her vision for France, but what of Macron?

Any knowledge you may have about Macron probably comes from mainstream news outlets, which have been uniformly gushing about the socialist-centrist Rothschild protege.

Meet Emmanuel Macron – The Consummate Banker Puppet, Bizarre Elitist Creation

The stakes are high, not only for France, but also for the future survival of the Eurozone. In the wake of Brexit and increasingly belicose refusal by former Eastern Bolc nations to swallow the bitter pill of coercive engineered migration, a Le Pen victory on the 7th May would cause a fatal fracture at the very heart of the union.

Like the IMF installed technocrats of previously financially troubled nations in or on the perphery of the Eurozone, Macron fits the model of a man who would do the bidding of his globalist puppet masters.

As Michael Krieger of Liberty Blitzkrieg reports:

Contrary to media myths about a “white knight” who came out of nowhere to save France, this character has had his eye on high political office for at least a decade. Indeed, it appears Macron has been groomed by powerful financiers for a very long time. As the FT also notes:

The graduate of ENA, the elite school that breeds France’s future leaders, came recommended by powerful alumni of the institution, including François Henrot, a longtime Rothschild partner. But young bankers were not so impressed.

“He was the guy who would constantly say ‘thank you’,” a former colleague said. “He didn’t know what ebitda [earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation] was. He didn’t try to hide it. And instead of looking it up in a corporate finance book, he asked around, which was disarming.”

Yet it wasn’t just a Rothschild sponsor who took the young Macron under his wing…

What Mr Macron lacked in technical knowledge and jargon at first, he made up for with contacts in government, says Sophie Javary, head of BNP Paribas’ corporate finance in Europe, who was asked by Mr Henrot to coach Mr Macron in the first year.

This is straight up bizarre. It appears Macron was so important to banking interests the had to form a consortium of firms to all pitch in to help him out. Yet it gets stranger still.

On the Atos deal, Mr Macron “had a fairly junior role at the time — he would be asked to redo the financial models on Excel, the basics,” recalled an adviser. But a few days after the deal was announced, Mr Macron was made a partner. A few months later, he stunned colleagues and rivals by winning a role in Nestlé’s purchase of Pfizer’s infant food operations.

As someone who spent ten years on Wall Street, I can tell you with certainty that you don’t go from updating excel models at a junior level to partner overnight. Someone extraordinarily powerful was pulling all sorts of strings for this guy. There seems to be little doubt about this.

Read Full Article

Pollsters are predicting that Emmanual Macron will be the next president of France. But as we learnt twice in 2016 with Brexit and U.S. election, either the prediction polls got it woefully wrong and failed to read the intention of voters, or they were cynically engaging in a campaign of wishful thinking (propaganda).

The French presidential election sees the same, now familiar forces, fighting an almost identical battle, and so we can expect the same mainstream media treatment and potential outcome.

Black Pudding: Right Wing Superfood









Pepe the Frog & Trash Dove, are being joined by an Alt Right superfood, Black Pudding. A traditional food found throughout Europe, it consists of a sausage made from pig’s blood, which is first boiled down and reduced after which cuts of pork fat are added. ‘Loaded with protein, potassium, calcium and magnesium, as well as being practically carb free,’ Black Pudding is being hailed as a super-food

Darren Beale from said: “2015 saw healthy eating reach a new level and this year we predict this trend is only going to get bigger. Some of the foods have been on the up for a while like avocado oil and maca root, but others like mushrooms and black pudding have been a total surprise to us.

“It’s great to have this new research available to find out the hidden qualities in food and we can’t wait to see how these new trends take off.”

At least one butcher claims to have seen a boom in sales. Lorna Maclennan, director of Stornoway’s Charles Macleod Butchers’ shop, told the Stornoway Gazette: “We have had a surge in the number of people ordering their black puddings direct, January is usually quiet, but we have had 100 orders with more coming in all the time.”

You might be scared of saying what you really think on Facebook, but you can still eat what you like.

Made from pork and pig’s blood, Black Pudding is recognized as being the most anti-Islamic food on the planet. And this could go some way to explain its renaissance amongst a growing numbers of nationalists resisting federalist tyranny & Islamic immigration within the E.U, as people’s eating habits are not currently subjected to the same coercisive control as their social media profiles.

Former UKiP leader Nigel Farage is said to consume three per day, and when Donald Trump became U.S. President, Farage is said to have presented him with a stick of weapon’s grade Lancastrian black pudding; whilst French presidential hopeful, Marine Le Pen has a slice added to smoothies.

Black Pudding in it’s natural environment.

The best way to enjoy black pudding is to serve it grilled as part of a fried English breakfast with a mandatory accompanyment of HP Sauce. At Christmas, it can also be presented as a side dish to ward off both vegan SJW’s & Islamists during the festive season. And if eaten in sufficient quantities, it produces a ‘Vampire high’ – an iron rush similar to those enjoyed by blood suckers.

Deus Vult: Black Pudding wrapped in bacon escorted by a flotilla of cocktail sausages during Christmas Day manoeuvres.

One of the most astonishing things about black pudding is that it has so far survived the current puritanical pogrom of liberal book burning and banning. You look at it and you think to yourself: how the fuck is this stuff still legal? Its mere availability in butcher’s shop windows and on the menu at cafes across the western world, is the biggest fuck you both the E.U. tyrants and Islamofascists could receive.

So eat up and enjoy. The consuming of black pudding is an act of both religious & political defiance, and any other Pope in history would be offering treasures in heaven for its mass consumption by children.

Deus Vult Bitchez!


Dead Children: Syria vs Stockholm

If last week confirmed anything, it is the apex propaganda status dead children occupy in the collective consciousness. As a parent, there is nothing more disturbing than the sight of dead children; it’s gauranteed to trigger a response that seeks to protect the vulnerable & innocent at any cost.

And that unfortunately is why dead children are employed whenever public opinion is required before a large event or drastic change in policy.

Prior to the Gulf War of 1991, footage of a Kuwaiti nurse was broadcast giving testimony that Iraqi troops had pulled infants from hospital incubators and left them to die. Amnesty International even coroborated the story. Only trouble is, it emerged after the invasion that she was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S and the story was fabricated in order to sell the planned invasion. More Details

More recently, in 2011, a picture of Alan Kurdi, the 3 year old Syrian child found washed up on a Turkish beach acted as the catalyst to open the E.U. doors to over 800,000 migrants.

Alan Kurdi’s death was tragic and just one of many, but the engineered response was audacious to say the least, and you have to question whether the European public would have had the appetite for such a monumental influx of migrants without those pictures.

The abuse metered out to anyone who dared to question the wisdom of what became known as Merkel’s Plan during that period of collective hysteria, was the rage of a manipulated mob.

Last week we were treated to more upsetting footage of gassed and dying children in Syria. And the common theme once again, was that they were being employed in death as a vehicle for a drastic change in policy, namely U.S. military action against Assad.


So contrast that if you will, with the pictures we were shown in the aftermath of the Stockholm truck attack of the same day. We know that children died in that attack, although even their mention was kept to a minimum.

Instead of the stack of boys and their contorted limbs, we were shielded from the brutal and appalling reality of the attack by pictures of tarpaulins covering the victims.

Why is that? Why do we get to see dead Syrian children whilst  from seeing dead European children?

Clearly, just as the footage of dead Syrian children is aimed at convincing us of the need for more war and mass immigration programmes, the fear is that showing us the pictures of dead Swedish children will greatly dampen our appetite for more Islamic immigration. And that is ultimately what this is about.

I came across raw photos of the victims of the Stockholm Islamic truck attack on a Facebook group, and they are truly appalling.  Warning: graphic 

This is what the victims of progressive immigration policies look like. This is what the victims of imported Islamic terror look like.

The inconsistency and double standards employed by the MSM; our progressive politicians & their globalist masters provides clear testimony as to their agenda.

They don’t want us to see these images in case we suddenly wake up in large enough numbers to the madness they are engaged in. This is Merkel’s tax, and this is will be the fruit of Trudeau’s policies also.

If we stop the endless cycle of regime change and war, we end the flow of legitimate refugees and the army of economic migrants that acompny them.

People seem unable or unwilling to see the connection between the two, but that I believe is because they steadfastly refuse to admit that both are parts of a globalist agenda to destroy the nation state and the elements that hold it together.

That is why nationalism is a dirty word. Because without it, we’ll all shuffle off quietly to the slaughterhouse accepting this as normal.

Trump & Syria

U.S. President Donald Trump’s strike on a Syrian airbase last week caught everyone off guard. The situation rapidly disintegrated into military action after a chemical attack on Syrian civilians last Tuesday.

Trump was reportedly moved to action by the images of dead and dying children, despite widespread skepticism surrounding the origins of the attack and a comprehensive appreciation of how ‘fake news’ works.

So how could Trump, the red-pilled candiadate who promised to end the cycle of regime change and war, suddenly start implementing what to the untrained eye looks a lot like Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy?

Of course, the only people who could initiate such a policy under a Trump presidency, are the artchitects of that policy – the Deep State, and in order for that to happen, Trump’s administration would have to be compromised.

But let’s start at the beginning with the background players and their motives & interests. The intelligence services and western media has stated that this was the work of Assad. The first question people asked themselves was, what would Assad get out of such a move? And the answer is: Nothing.

As the NYT stated in an article that same day: A chemical weapons attack, if carried out by the government, would be a brazen statement of impunity, coming during a major international meeting in Brussels where officials are debating whether the European Union and other countries will contribute billions of dollars for reconstructing Syria if it is presided over by a government run by Mr. Assad.

Worst Chemical Attack in Years in Syria; U.S. Blames Assad

With Russian & Iranian support, the Syrian army has been making sustained gains in its six year civil war. To launch a chemical attack on civilians that is sure to draw the attention of Western nations makes no strategic sense at all. However, a timely attack of this nature richly benefits those who seek to unseat Assad – the rebels and the Deep State.

Until last week, the Trump admin held the poition that Assad was the best of the bad options. US signals openness to Assad staying put.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said on a trip to Turkey that the “longer-term status of President Assad will be decided by the Syrian people.” In New York, US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley was even stronger about the Trump administration’s decision not to push for Assad’s departure. “Our priority is no longer to sit and focus on getting Assad out,”

In an article for Disobedient Media this week, William Craddick wrote, It is strategically counterintuitive to assume that Bashar al-Assad would engage in a chemical attack on Syrians just one week after figures in the American government expressed the opinion that they would be willing to allow him to remain in power. The Syrian government no longer even possesses chemical weapons, as the United Nations and U.S. Department of State have already confirmed.   Read Full Article

There’s also been broad speculation that the release of chemical weapons was the result of a dump being hit rather than the gas being dropped by the regime.

On Thursday night, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said the U.S. intelligence community assessed with a “high degree of confidence” that the Syrian government had dropped a poison gas bomb on civilians in Idlib province. But a number of intelligence sources have made contradictory assessments, saying the preponderance of evidence suggests that Al Qaeda-affiliated rebels were at fault, either by orchestrating an intentional release of a chemical agent as a provocation or by possessing containers of poison gas that ruptured during a conventional bombing raid.

Former CIA Officer: The Intelligence Confirms the Russian Account on Syria

Rebels Are Known To Have Possessed And Used Chemical Weapons In Syria For Some Time

While the Syrian government surrendered their chemical arms stockpiles for destruction several years ago, evidence indicates that rebel groups in Syria have ramped up their own supplies of the deadly weapons systems and have not hesitated to deploy them in combat. On June 23rd, 2014, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Syrian government had completed the removal of all chemical weapons from the country per and agreement they had reached with the United States. The handover was confirmed by the United Nations Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. While the Syrian government have surrendered their chemical weapons, rebel groups have acquired and used them in increasing numbers. Read More

The authenticity of the footage of the attack, which proports to show aid workers treating victims of Sarin gas without the necessary protective equipment – a practice that would have put them in physical danger, has also been brought into question.

2013: Repeat Offenders

The last time there was a chemical attack broadly attributed to Assad in Syria back in 2013, it turned out that rebel forces were responsible. But at the time a concerted effort was made by the Obama admin & western liberal media to pin responsibility on Assad.

According to the United Nations 2013 mission led by Carla del Ponte:

“evidence from casualties and medical staff indicated that rebel forces in the civil war had used the deadly nerve agent sarin.

‘Our investigators have been in neighbouring countries interviewing victims, doctors and field hospitals, and there are strong, concrete suspicions, but not yet incontrovertible proof, of the use of sarin gas,’ said Del Ponte in an interview with Swiss-Italian television.

‘This was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the government authorities.’ Read More

Trump Playing 4D Chess?

The Alt Right seems to have split into two camps on Trump’s Syria strikes; those who support the man before all else – loyal Deplorables who will back Trump regardless, and those who see the war against globalism as the real battle; for whom attacking Syria singals that the integrity of this administration has been compromised in some way.

Those loyally supporting Trump through this believe that he is playing what is referred to as 4D Chess – the playing of multiple interconected games on different boards at one time and conveying signals via a range of theatres to a variety of players, as explained by Charles Hugh-Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

A signal is a form of communication, but its cost must be high to be persuasive. A signal can provide information on intent, depth of commitment, willingness to accept risk and much more. And is often intended to communicate different things to different audiences. The Media’s Missing The Point: Syria, Empire, & The Power Of Signaling

The one thing that Trump has managed with the strike against Assad, is to dispel the Deep State & Democratic Party narrative that he is in the pocket of Vladimir Putin. Although whether this episode was intended to that end, seems questionable.

A War in Heaven: Bannonites Vs Globalist Errand Boys

For anyone who supported Trump to this point, last week’s developments are troubling. News of a power struggle within the Whitehouse between cheif strategist Steve Bannon and Ivanka’s husband & Trump senior advisor, Jared Kushner have surfaced. And those fears of a compromise can’t be helped by reports that it was Ivanka who inspired her father to act on the footage of the aftermath.

The Daily Beast reported that fighting had been nonstop between Bannon and Kushner for weeks and that the two often clashed face-to-face. One official told the news outlet that Bannon said Kushner was trying to “shiv him and push him out the door.” They said Bannon recently vented about Kushner “being a ‘globalist’ and a ‘cuck.'”

War breaks out between the Steve Bannon and Jared Kushner factions in the White House

If someone wanted to get to Trump, they would need to do it through his inner circle. Is the anti-globalist Bannon being pushed out of the nest by the cuck Kushner, who has the ear of Ivanka and her father? It would explain a lot.

Russian Hacking: The Real Story

Yes, the real story surrounding the Russian hacking allegations which began if you remember during the election campaign, isn’t that it happened, but that the Deep State and their Democratic Ramoras continue to push this narrative without the presence of ANY evidence. Should we be skeptical? Absolutely. Don’t forget, these are the people who took us to war in Iraq based on fabricated evidence of WMD’s.

In fact the deeper they dig this hole of a lie, the greater the danger of having the walls fall in on them. And that’s what appears to be happening to former National Security Advisor, Susan Rice.

As noted last night, Journalist and author Mike Cernovich dropped an exclusive bombshell – naming Obama’s National Security Advisor Susan Rice as the official responsible for the ‘unmasking’ of the incoming Trump team during ‘incidental’ surveillance. This was apparently discovered after the White House Counsel’s office reviewed Rice’s document log requests. Full Article

It would appear that Rice unmasked the identity of the Trump team against protocol, and for what appear to be purely partisan reasons, if the ‘incidental surveillance’ narrative is to be believed at all.

Conservative Ken Doll look-a-likee and bard of the red pilled right, Tucker Carlson was having none of it, and started his nightly show already in kill mode.

Tucker Carlson: ‘Our Laws Provide No Serious Protection From Being Spied Upon For Political Reasons.’

Immediately after which, former State Department official & foreign policy advisor under Obama, David Tafori had the unenviable task of trying to defend the increasingly tired sounding narrative to Carlson, who by this stage was marauding high on the blood of virgins, duplicitous democrats and whatever else he could get hold of.  Please watch

And how did CNN respond to the revelation that Rice disclosed the identities of individuals caught unintentionally in a surveillance sweep – that is based remember on the allegation of Russian interference that originated from Clinton campaign sources – and for which, to date, they have failed to provide any evidence for?

Last night, Lemon began “CNN Tonight” with an announcement that the Rice report a “fake scandal ginned up by right-wing media and Trump” that he would not be baited into justifying with coverage.

“On this program tonight, we will not insult your intelligence by pretending,” it’s legitimate, he said. “Nor will we aid and abet the people trying to misinform you, the American people, by creating a diversion. Not going to do it.”

CNN Rages Against ‘Susan Rice Bombshell’, Urges Viewers To Ignore Story

And here is Tucker Carlson challenging Democratic congressman and House Intelligence Committee member, Adam Schiff  to back up his allegations by stating publically on camera that he knows for a fact that the Russian government hacked the election.

He can’t do it.


Trudeau #Scumbag

A lesbian is heartlessly pushed to the back by Justin’s rampant lust for Islam

Well, we didn’t need a guy with a camcoder in Winnipeg to tell us that Trudeau was a scumbag, but full credit to that man for opening the dialogue. #Scumbag

Josh Sigurdson of the World Alternative Media confronted an uncomfortable looking Trudeau on his carbon tax policy at a press conference, calling him a ‘scumbag’ and declaring ‘shame on you and your globalist counterparts’ as he was ushered from the room.

This incident was the latest sign that the Canadian public are waking up to the reality that life under Trudeau is less like going out with the dreamiest guy on campus, and more a futuristic distopian novel about life under a tyranny of decency; delivered in warm tones by the state broadcaster, which is now actively listing criticism of Islam as ‘Islamophobia’ CBC now labels comments criticizing Islam as “Islamophobic” 

Sigurdson set an example to all Canadians unhappy with Trudeau’s plan to spend hundreds of billions of dollars turning the country into Sweden – a failed state in waiting. This ‘dialogue’ is essential; Trudeau needs to be told what a scumbag he is.

Carbon Tax? Trudeau is a cultural cuckold & carrier for the Islam virus

Whether we are talking about carbon tax, generous foriegn aid or mass Islamic immigration, progressive zealots like Trudeau are consumate cucks for whom ideology trumps both reality and elected office.

If Trudeau and his globalist cohorts want to destroy this country, then it is our duty to make it as difficult as possible for them; lay down a heavy barrage of hashtags on his globalist ass for the weaponized autism of 4 Chan to turn its collective mind upon; Tweet him @JustinTrudeau; tag him on Facebook. E.g.  Who was this photo taken with?  A: Trudeau #scumbag.

We made Brexit & Trump a reality, so we should be able to take this clown down, no problem. #Scumbag #MCGA #PresidentPoolBoy