Two stories this week on the surface could not have been more different. In one, pictures of Justin Trudeau frolicking with the crowds at Toronto’s Pride parade. In the other, news that six cities across Canada were making legal moves to outlaw ‘Islamaphobia.’  Read More

The first thing you would presume from that, is that Canada has a severe enough problem with ‘hate crimes’ against its small muslim population, that sweeping legislation is quickly required to protect them. Not so, ‘Islamophobia’ is nowhere near a serious issue in Canada despite a rise in ‘attacks’ over the past three recorded years from 45 in 2012, to 99 nationwide in 2014, in the face of Islamic extremists waging a near constant campaign of terror attacks against Western liberal democracies in the name of the religion.

It is worth noting that 35 Catholics & 213 Jews were also ‘attacked’ in the same period. And, as you will see, the use of the term ‘attack’ should be taken broadly to be anything from social media posts; name calling / bullying, to verbal abuse. The number of actual physical attacks are very small.

In fact, the National Council of Canadian Muslims listed just six (6) incidents of physical assault for 2014 and twelve (12) incidents of attacks on property. Read Full Report

Read Full Article

Actually, I think we should consider these figure a success, considering the frailty of some members of any population to rationalize threat & response once they have had an ideological & religious war declared upon them by members of a religious group present in increasing numbers within their societies.

These figures, when broken down, hardly justify sweeping legislation targeting criticism of Islam or Muslims. So therefore the motivation must be political.

As we have covered previously, Trudeau’s creeping Sharia is progressive policy for all liberal democracies, it’s just that Canada under Trudeau has become so zealously progressive, that it leads the way in dangerous ideological inconsistencies.

Regardless of Trudeau’s infantile incapacity to appreciate that the gay rights he was so enthusiastically celebrating last weekend have little in common with the Islamic culture he is equally eager to provide special status for, Canada under Trudeau is leading the world in cracking down on legitimate criticism of radical Islam’s near global campaign of intolerant violence against all others.

The “Islamophobia” business is a dangerous victimology narrative used by stealth jihadists to serve an agenda, as proclaimed by a former representative of the International Institute for Islamic Thought who was present at the inception of the use of this term. Abdur-Rahman Muhammad stated about “Islamophobia”:

“This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.”   Read Full Article

If Trudeau were a true Islamophile, he would know that Taqiyya permits the faithful to deceive a host and employ whatever methods available in order to facilitate the establishment of an Islamic society, and  anti-Islamaphobic legislation is designed to disarm host societies of their ability to defend themselves from creeping Sharia.

A lot of media coverage have been given to the rise in racist abuse and attacks since the Brexit vote to Leave the E.U. on June 23rd. This rise has been given plenty of column space and air time, even here in Canada where the loyally progressive CBC radio ran, not one, but two pieces in one day, which followed a dressing down for Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau for meddling in British politics. Read More

The majority of incidents reported have taken the form of verbal abuse, with a small number of physical attacks. Britain has seen a rise in recorded numbers of attacks from 63 to 331 over the period. Read More

A social media page has been set up entitled Worrying Signs and the incidents have been capitalized upon to continue the campaign against the Leave camp in the wake of the result. More

What has not been given anything like the same kind of attention, were the death threats made to UKiP leader, Nigel Farage.

Or the threats made to Labour party members in the wake of the vote of no confidence in leadership of opposition leader, Jeremy Corbyn, which included threats to kill the children of those involved in an attempt to unseat the Labour leader after his dismal handling of Labour’s campaign to Remain. Read More

Those who maintain that this spike in racist behaviour is the direct result of the Brexit have got this the wrong way around; the decades of failed policies that saw the poor ideologically abandoned in favour of migrants and the practice of stigmatizing those with valid concerns in regards to the policies pursued by both the E.U. and progressive left over the past 25 years are responsible for BOTH the Brexit result and the spike in racist assaults.

 

 

After the dust had settled on the Brexit result, UKiP leader and architect behind the campaign for Britain to Leave the E.U., Nigel Farage, wasted no time in setting about smacking around a list of people who had ‘had it coming’.

On Sunday he let Canadian Pool Boy President, Justin Trudeau have it for actively supporting the Remain campaign.

“I mean I’d love the Canadian Prime Minister to tell you guys that you’ve decided to make NAFTA a political union, and that you are going to transfer all Ottawa’s authority to someone else, that you are going to have foreign courts overruling you,” he said. “How long would you last? A day? A week? And yet that’s what the Canadian Prime Minister was effectively recommending to us. I wonder sometimes whether foreign leaders genuinely understand what the European Union is.” Read Full Story

Then he let Barrack Obama have both barrels for his invasive meddling in trying to persuade Britons to ‘Remain.’ Which even saw an Op-Ed piece by Obama in the Daily Telegraph. Read More 

“Well ultimately let me say this, Vladimir Putin behaved in a more statesmanlike manner than President Obama did in this referendum campaign. Obama came to Britain and I think behaved disgracefully, telling us we’d be at the back of the queue. Treating us, America’s strongest, oldest ally, in this extraordinary way. Vladimir Putin maintained his silence throughout the whole campaign.”

Read Full Article

But Farage was far from done. On Monday morning he caught an early flight to Brussels and set about smacking around the entire E.U parliament to boos and jeers from the members, and to the seething fury of Jean-Claude Junker. Full Speech

He then later that day finished off the perfect week by smacking around the queen bitch, Hillary Clinton by declaring:  “There is nothing on earth that could ever persuade me to vote for Hillary Clinton.”

Read Full Article

Simply put, in a political world full of grocery clerks and errand boys, on current form Nigel Farage should be running the country.

 

Against all expectations, Britain has voted to leave the European Union in a truly seismic result. The federalists have been sent packing in what was always going to be a close run referendum: 52% to 48%, with over 70% of the eligible population turning out to vote.

The Remain campaign, consisting of a rather unlikely but revealing alliance of federalists, progressive liberals & crony capitalists, ran a campaign built on the classic progressive chassis of slurs, vilification & scare tactics, ultimately failed as people decided that the apocalypse they were told would unfold if they made the decision to leave was a risk worth taking, given that past generations had paid in blood to retain the sovereignty they were being asked to casually surrender.

Throughout the morning defeated federalists queued up to give life to the rather fanciful idea that the British people hadn’t really voted against further E.U. membership, but instead were giving a bloody nose to the establishment.

Even though he was not the official leader of the Leave campaign, the man of the hour has to be Nigel Farage, whose raison d’etre (excuse my French) for the past 25 years has been to remove Britain from a European Superstate.

It must have been fairly lonely being Nigel Farage at times over the past ten years – taking all the medieval village waste the Conservatives, E.U federalists and the progressive left could throw at him. He deserves this moment and this very British victory.

Strip away the spin and the narrative still being offered the next day, the British people, have rejected a politburo model of remote governance, unbridled by democracy or policy restrictions.

Contrary to what a conveyor belt of leftist politicians were saying this morning, this was a vote against a federalist E.U. who enjoys ultimate power without accountability; it was about wrestling sovereignty back from technocrats whose last interest is that of the British people. Their’s is a federalist agenda. Eurosceptecism across Europe is rife due to the failure of their progressive policy of forcing ideological pegs into cultural holes that has the commission handing out migrant quotas to nation states under threat of heavy fines.

The fearful thing to do would have been to stay, and full credit should given to people who did not buckle in the face of slurs and threats. The E.U. is an unelected governing body that decides policy in private and then imposes those decisions on the populations of member states. America fought and won a war of independence over these very issues, and they should appreciate the significance of this moment more than anyone else.

During this campaign, it mattered not that you could articulate your reasons and challenge those whose only game seemed to be a childishly simple shame game. To date we are yet to hear one convincing argument from anyone in the Remain camp. They clearly thought all that was required were the usual slurs and vilification of the opposition. Well, today they are left with nothing but the brittle shell of their failed propaganda and their ideological tears.

 

In the wake of the attack on a gay nightclub in Florida by an Islamic gunman, the same old issues continue to raise themselves with depressing regularity, along with a few new ones.

As the left now pretends to wrestle with an aggregation fallacy they have entertained for some time now: gay rights vs Islam, those of us who have been following this for some time know that the progressive left has already chosen Islam over gay rights. It was decided some time ago, and implicitly supported by LGBT silence over the treatment of gay people in countries who follow Islamic laws. Read More

Ideologically you cannot support both without arriving at an awkward or impossible contradiction at some point, and it would seem, that point is now. I am of course basing this on the trust that there remains enough people within society who are free of the worst ravages of this particular brand of insanity to force a change, or capable of realization.

At the same time, the Democratic party’s leadership, both Barrack Obama & Hillary Clinton, continue with the policy of circumventing a global threat whose name they refuse to utter. Instead using the killing of 50 people for their sexual orientation as an opportunity to drive home their gun control agenda. Read More

At this stage, it’s all getting a bit ridiculous. Obama’s continued failure to say the words ‘Islamic terrorism’ is indicative of either affiliation or a denial that disqualifies him from further office based on mental health grounds. Of course I am be disingenuously naive: it is part of a perverse progressive logic that appears to be laying the groundwork for the Islamization of all western societies.

It is so bad that even gunman Omar Mateen did not trust the Obama’s admin to report his motivation honestly, instead deciding to call in his motive to 911 just prior to the attack, because presumably, he knew that the Obama admin and press outlets would do everything they could to avoid making the link to Islamic terror.

Obama’s dogged refusal to utter the name of a foe that has declared war on the rest of the world, instead choosing to focus on the enemy’s access to weaponry, is akin to Winston Churchill in 1941 decrying Nazi Germany’s access to twin engined bombers during the Blitz without mentioning Hitler or the Nazis specifically by name. It is simply ludicrous and criminally insane.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump is being touted as a dangerous demagogue, but in all fairness, they are making things childishly easy for him. When you have an incumbent leader and presidential candidate, both of whom refuse to identify the enemy they face, Trump’s unbridled ability to identify that enemy and say its name rather makes him look like the only person at the top table who is living in reality; when all you have to do is merely point out that the emperor is naked, your opponents (or rather the ideology they inhabit) make it an incredibly simple game in times like these.

Until Obama, Clinton and the likes of Trudeau here in Canada start living in reality instead of ideology, they will continue to be challenged and embarrassed by the realities of the world in which we live. But don’t hold your breath, liberals do not acknowledge mistakes, and consistently double down on the coercive rhetoric when challenged with such realities.

 

 

O.k. so this is how it goes: if you don’t want to be part of the European Union, you  are a Little Englander – a small minded bigot, a xenophobe and racist. It matters little that you can to communicate practical & philosophical reasons why you oppose the creation of a bureaucratic superstate build upon collective surrendering of sovereignty; or why you don’t think it’s a good idea being part of a stagnating and restrictive trading block; or why you have an issue with an unelected commission imposing immigration quotas under pain of financial duress.

None of that matters, because those on the liberal left who want you to be part of this brave experiment in collective failure have built their entire political & ideological modus operandi on slur slinging and coercive spin.

At this stage being called a bigot or a racist by these gameless tub-thumping clowns should be seen as a compliment.

They should really be asking themselves why they find themselves bedfellows with progressive Conservatives like Cameron – who is clearly doing the bidding of a shadow elite. Or why they, the same people who opposed globalization 10 years ago are now so eager to be part of an E.U. superstate? Or why Barrack Obama did an Op-Ed in the Daily Telegraph to remind British people that their best interests lie in Europe? No agenda there then.

Well, it seems that Little Englander disease is now spreading throughout Europe.

According to a series of recent Pew Research polls (lefties hate polls), anti-Brussels sentiment has risen sharply all across Europe over the past year thanks to a toxic combination of economic stagnation and the mismanagement of the migrant crisis

Full Article & Pew Research Report

It would appear that this ideological sickness is spreading and the recorded cases of Little Spaniards and Little Greeks disease are rising, with a significant number of cases also being reported in Germany.

There are two areas in particular where attitudes towards the E.U. are poor to say the least: the handling of the immigration crisis and economy. With nearly 94% of Greeks and 88% of Swedes saying that they disapprove of the way the E.U. is handling the immigration crisis, and a majority in Greece, Italy, France, Spain, Sweden & the U.K saying that they disapprove of the way the E.U. has handled the economic crisis.

In a sign that Europe’s publics increasingly want an end to the principle of ‘ever closer union’, more than twice as many people surveyed – some 42 per cent – said they wanted powers returned to their national parliaments than said they wanted powers transferred to Brussels.

As the British head to the polls, just 6% of the public in the UK wants such an outcome. And only 8% of Greeks favour more power for the EU. The strongest backing for an ever closer Europe is only 34%, in France

Someone needs to explain to them that their condition is in direct relation to their inherent racism and xenophobia, and nothing to do with practical experience living under a collapsing E.U.

Remember, in progressive ideology: if the dream is correct, reality must be made to fit.

Ivan Penaluna