
Nigel Farage discusses the media and Establishment disconnect with real British people, why Brexit won, “fundamental change in British politics,” Trump, the importance of new media in dissent, the EU’s contempt for democracy, and more.

Nigel Farage discusses the media and Establishment disconnect with real British people, why Brexit won, “fundamental change in British politics,” Trump, the importance of new media in dissent, the EU’s contempt for democracy, and more.

Two of our favourite Brits (aside from Ivan, of course!) talk about the joys of being culturally enriched by Islamic terrorists, the potential backlash, and treasonous politicians and media:

By all standards, progressive liberal men are a ridiculous creation; an emasculated hybrid genetically closer to the sun-starved calves that produce veal than our distant ancestors.
After decades of constantly checking their male white privilege at the door and apologizing for everything from their masculinity to Islamic terror, they are a shell of significance; a virtual empty vessel.
The nationalization of the family by the state means that they are no long required to provide for, or raise a family. The welfare state has replaced them and all but rendered their traditional role ‘surplus to requirement.’
Mark Steyn: The Nationalization of the Family
Skinny jeans have not only ensured that the testicles of progressive men produce no sperm, but that they cannot run or fight either. They are literally useless. It’s so bad that even progressive women don’t want to fuck them.
Progressive liberals are cultural cuckolds; they delight in seeing their culture getting shafted by another, and the depth of cultural self-loathing that drives it has left modern liberals so ravaged by their own propaganda, that when it comes imposing their political will on the street, European liberals have to rely on Islamists in very much in the same way liberals in the U.S. have to ally themselves with Black Lives Matter.
This is all part of the plan Cultural Marxism had for the West; offering liberation from tradition was an alluring deception that we could have it all without any concern for the future, whilst the fabric of our societies was picked apart and felled by its two largest weapons: multiculturalism & political correctness.
‘If you are confused as to what cultural Marxism really is I highly suggest you research as much as possible into the Frankfurt School founded by Marxist professors and academics in Germany during the 1920s and the early 1930s. The basic foundation of the Frankfurt School was to take the collectivist philosophy of Karl Marx, which revolved primarily around economic class structure, and apply it in a more sociological manner utilizing Hegelian dynamics.
The Frankfurt School sought to explore “class oppression” not only between the rich and the poor, the workers and the aristocracy, but also in aspect to races, religions, families, genders, behavioral psychology, etc. That is to say, the Marxists of the Frankfurt School were looking for new methods to divide and conquer existing societies and nations beyond simple economic conflicts.’
‘The pervasive weakness among cultural Marxists in America is that they tend to believe their own propaganda. They think that they are an actual social force in this country with the numbers and support to back their activities. They fell into this delusion because for a time they have been effective at infiltrating popular media and generating a false consensus, not to mention organizing public and online mobs to be used as a weapon against others. They seem to be everywhere, yet they are few.’
If you doubt that Cultural Marxism exists, take a look at the generation of virtue signalling, feeling-centric apologists we have produced. Progressive society no longer aims to produce men, but ideological modified gender neutral beings, or ‘man bitches’ by design.

Two stories this week on the surface could not have been more different. In one, pictures of Justin Trudeau frolicking with the crowds at Toronto’s Pride parade. In the other, news that six cities across Canada were making legal moves to outlaw ‘Islamaphobia.’ Read More
The first thing you would presume from that, is that Canada has a severe enough problem with ‘hate crimes’ against its small muslim population, that sweeping legislation is quickly required to protect them. Not so, ‘Islamophobia’ is nowhere near a serious issue in Canada despite a rise in ‘attacks’ over the past three recorded years from 45 in 2012, to 99 nationwide in 2014, in the face of Islamic extremists waging a near constant campaign of terror attacks against Western liberal democracies in the name of the religion.

It is worth noting that 35 Catholics & 213 Jews were also ‘attacked’ in the same period. And, as you will see, the use of the term ‘attack’ should be taken broadly to be anything from social media posts; name calling / bullying, to verbal abuse. The number of actual physical attacks are very small.
In fact, the National Council of Canadian Muslims listed just six (6) incidents of physical assault for 2014 and twelve (12) incidents of attacks on property. Read Full Report
Actually, I think we should consider these figure a success, considering the frailty of some members of any population to rationalize threat & response once they have had an ideological & religious war declared upon them by members of a religious group present in increasing numbers within their societies.
These figures, when broken down, hardly justify sweeping legislation targeting criticism of Islam or Muslims. So therefore the motivation must be political.
As we have covered previously, Trudeau’s creeping Sharia is progressive policy for all liberal democracies, it’s just that Canada under Trudeau has become so zealously progressive, that it leads the way in dangerous ideological inconsistencies.
Regardless of Trudeau’s infantile incapacity to appreciate that the gay rights he was so enthusiastically celebrating last weekend have little in common with the Islamic culture he is equally eager to provide special status for, Canada under Trudeau is leading the world in cracking down on legitimate criticism of radical Islam’s near global campaign of intolerant violence against all others.
The “Islamophobia” business is a dangerous victimology narrative used by stealth jihadists to serve an agenda, as proclaimed by a former representative of the International Institute for Islamic Thought who was present at the inception of the use of this term. Abdur-Rahman Muhammad stated about “Islamophobia”:
“This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” Read Full Article
If Trudeau were a true Islamophile, he would know that Taqiyya permits the faithful to deceive a host and employ whatever methods available in order to facilitate the establishment of an Islamic society, and anti-Islamaphobic legislation is designed to disarm host societies of their ability to defend themselves from creeping Sharia.

Jim Goad writes at Taki’s Magazine about this week’s police shootings and statistics Black Lives Matter probably don’t want you to know about.
In response to the transracial Shaun King’s assertion that police murders of blacks have “never been this widespread in the history of America,” Goad retorts that
Is that true? Of course not! Police shootings of black men in the USA are down from around 100 a year in the 1960s to about 35 yearly these days. Taking into account the fact that America’s black population has roughly doubled in that timespan, on a per-capita basis, police shootings of black men have plummeted around 80% since the 1960s.
He goes on to discuss some of the more Machiavellian motives behind the media and politicians’ bleating on the case as well as the activists’ and some inconvenient facts about the victims as well as the man who murdered 5 Dallas cops and shot several others.
Gavin McInnes also weighed in at Taki’s on the recent outbreak of riots and the media’s incitement of them followed by admonishing viewers that the Dallas protest where the cops were murdered was in fact a peaceful protest despite what their own cameras were showing.:
The reason these reporters were acting like teachers is that’s how they see themselves. They don’t just report the news, they Voxplain it. Of course, the problem with thought control is you need to keep correcting the course. First they tell us “racism is alive and well” and we should be disgusted with our country, but when that starts a riot, they backpedal and tell us we’re overreacting. … The clowns on TV went to Cultural Marxism school so they’re not trained journalists. They’re trained socialists. This means they’re experts at propaganda and controlling the populace while having little or no interest in the truth.

A lot of media coverage have been given to the rise in racist abuse and attacks since the Brexit vote to Leave the E.U. on June 23rd. This rise has been given plenty of column space and air time, even here in Canada where the loyally progressive CBC radio ran, not one, but two pieces in one day, which followed a dressing down for Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau for meddling in British politics. Read More
The majority of incidents reported have taken the form of verbal abuse, with a small number of physical attacks. Britain has seen a rise in recorded numbers of attacks from 63 to 331 over the period. Read More
A social media page has been set up entitled Worrying Signs and the incidents have been capitalized upon to continue the campaign against the Leave camp in the wake of the result. More
What has not been given anything like the same kind of attention, were the death threats made to UKiP leader, Nigel Farage.

Or the threats made to Labour party members in the wake of the vote of no confidence in leadership of opposition leader, Jeremy Corbyn, which included threats to kill the children of those involved in an attempt to unseat the Labour leader after his dismal handling of Labour’s campaign to Remain. Read More
Those who maintain that this spike in racist behaviour is the direct result of the Brexit have got this the wrong way around; the decades of failed policies that saw the poor ideologically abandoned in favour of migrants and the practice of stigmatizing those with valid concerns in regards to the policies pursued by both the E.U. and progressive left over the past 25 years are responsible for BOTH the Brexit result and the spike in racist assaults.

After the dust had settled on the Brexit result, UKiP leader and architect behind the campaign for Britain to Leave the E.U., Nigel Farage, wasted no time in setting about smacking around a list of people who had ‘had it coming’.
On Sunday he let Canadian Pool Boy President, Justin Trudeau have it for actively supporting the Remain campaign.
“I mean I’d love the Canadian Prime Minister to tell you guys that you’ve decided to make NAFTA a political union, and that you are going to transfer all Ottawa’s authority to someone else, that you are going to have foreign courts overruling you,” he said. “How long would you last? A day? A week? And yet that’s what the Canadian Prime Minister was effectively recommending to us. I wonder sometimes whether foreign leaders genuinely understand what the European Union is.” Read Full Story
Then he let Barrack Obama have both barrels for his invasive meddling in trying to persuade Britons to ‘Remain.’ Which even saw an Op-Ed piece by Obama in the Daily Telegraph. Read More
“Well ultimately let me say this, Vladimir Putin behaved in a more statesmanlike manner than President Obama did in this referendum campaign. Obama came to Britain and I think behaved disgracefully, telling us we’d be at the back of the queue. Treating us, America’s strongest, oldest ally, in this extraordinary way. Vladimir Putin maintained his silence throughout the whole campaign.”
But Farage was far from done. On Monday morning he caught an early flight to Brussels and set about smacking around the entire E.U parliament to boos and jeers from the members, and to the seething fury of Jean-Claude Junker. Full Speech
He then later that day finished off the perfect week by smacking around the queen bitch, Hillary Clinton by declaring: “There is nothing on earth that could ever persuade me to vote for Hillary Clinton.”
Simply put, in a political world full of grocery clerks and errand boys, on current form Nigel Farage should be running the country.
We are going to keep this really simple, as we appreciate that Barry is having severe problems understanding the threat radical Islam poses. Thanks to Sesame Street.

Against all expectations, Britain has voted to leave the European Union in a truly seismic result. The federalists have been sent packing in what was always going to be a close run referendum: 52% to 48%, with over 70% of the eligible population turning out to vote.
The Remain campaign, consisting of a rather unlikely but revealing alliance of federalists, progressive liberals & crony capitalists, ran a campaign built on the classic progressive chassis of slurs, vilification & scare tactics, ultimately failed as people decided that the apocalypse they were told would unfold if they made the decision to leave was a risk worth taking, given that past generations had paid in blood to retain the sovereignty they were being asked to casually surrender.
Throughout the morning defeated federalists queued up to give life to the rather fanciful idea that the British people hadn’t really voted against further E.U. membership, but instead were giving a bloody nose to the establishment.

Even though he was not the official leader of the Leave campaign, the man of the hour has to be Nigel Farage, whose raison d’etre (excuse my French) for the past 25 years has been to remove Britain from a European Superstate.
It must have been fairly lonely being Nigel Farage at times over the past ten years – taking all the medieval village waste the Conservatives, E.U federalists and the progressive left could throw at him. He deserves this moment and this very British victory.
Strip away the spin and the narrative still being offered the next day, the British people, have rejected a politburo model of remote governance, unbridled by democracy or policy restrictions.
Contrary to what a conveyor belt of leftist politicians were saying this morning, this was a vote against a federalist E.U. who enjoys ultimate power without accountability; it was about wrestling sovereignty back from technocrats whose last interest is that of the British people. Their’s is a federalist agenda. Eurosceptecism across Europe is rife due to the failure of their progressive policy of forcing ideological pegs into cultural holes that has the commission handing out migrant quotas to nation states under threat of heavy fines.
The fearful thing to do would have been to stay, and full credit should given to people who did not buckle in the face of slurs and threats. The E.U. is an unelected governing body that decides policy in private and then imposes those decisions on the populations of member states. America fought and won a war of independence over these very issues, and they should appreciate the significance of this moment more than anyone else.
During this campaign, it mattered not that you could articulate your reasons and challenge those whose only game seemed to be a childishly simple shame game. To date we are yet to hear one convincing argument from anyone in the Remain camp. They clearly thought all that was required were the usual slurs and vilification of the opposition. Well, today they are left with nothing but the brittle shell of their failed propaganda and their ideological tears.

Interesting article over at Return of Kings about how Peru defeated their Shining Path guerillas, led by Abimael Guzman, with obvious applicability to the likes of ISIS:
But the government eventually learned counter-insurgency methods. These began before the election of Alberto Fujimori, but he definitely added impetus and urgency to them. In 1992, Guzman himself was captured and exhibited to the public in a cage. It was a stunning reversal for the Shining Path, and thereafter it gradually withered away.