Category: Opinion

M103: Canadian Stealth Tyranny

An Islamist And Her Cuckold

By this point it should not be news to many that elements within Trudeau’s liberal government are putting forward a motion, that they say is aimed at tackling, or more specifically, ‘quelling’ the ‘hatred and fear’ associated with Islamaphobia.

M-103, which was tabled by Iqra Khalid in December 2016 and calls on the government to ‘recognize the need to quell the increasing public climate of hate and fear’ had its first debate in the house last week. During which Khalid compared the faux plight of modern Muslims with the Holocaust for Jews.

Mississauga, Ont., MP Iqra Khalid, who led debate in the House of Commons tonight on M-103, said the common definition of Islamophobia is “the irrational hate of Muslims that leads to discrimination,” and that her motion must not remove the word.

“I will not do so, any more than I would speak to the Holocaust and not mention that the overwhelming majority of victims were six million followers of the Jewish faith and that anti-Semitism was the root cause of the Holocaust,” she said. “We cannot address a problem if we fail to call it by its true name.”  Read Article

There are a couple of things however that should concern every Canadian citizen.

Firstly, let’s just get into the semantics here for a moment, as not surprisingly, that’s where a lot of motions and laws actually lie. Quelling hate involves forcefullness & implies violence; whilst quelling fear requires an opposite kind of skill set: reassurance.

No prizes for guessing which interpretation the anti-Islamaphobia motion will offer any progressive lucky enough to possess it in their arsenal.

Secondly, there exists no legal definition of what Islamaphobia actually is… No really; there is no clear definition. Surely you would need a legal definition before basing a motion upon it? Apparently not, not in a world made up of feelings and ideological imperative.

The National Council of Canadian Muslims did offer a definition which could provide some reassurance.

In an op-ed on CBC’s website, Amira Elghawaby, the communications director at the National Council of Canadian Muslims provided a definition to the term Islamophobia… as referring to the irrational fear and hatred of Muslims, which can lead to discrimination and violence. Read Full Article

Like a growing number of people, I can safely demonstrate that my fear of Islam is completely rational and based on a mountain of evidence streaming in daily from across the liberal Western world as to the incompatibility of Islam and its adherents with our values and societal model. This evidence is undeniably made up of a culture of violence, intolerance and intimidation. So you have to ask yourself, why would progressive governments be seeking to offer protected status to such a flawed and destructive import?

The nearest thing the red pilled right actually have is a critical definition often wrongly accreditted to the late Christopher Hitchens.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But we doubt this is the definition the Liberal Party will be operating from.

As we have previously covered in Trudeau’s Tyranny of Decency, the recorded number of attacks against Muslims or their property in Canada is lower than it is for Jews, or even Catholics. Therefore, the desire for anti-Islamaphobia legislation must be politically based, as the figures do not support legal intervention to address a crisis of any recognizable size.

Who would look at Europe and say, ‘Let’s have some of that over here’?

We need to call out the Islamists establishing a foothold in Canada. I personally know many progressive Canadaians who are able to look at the undeniable but avoidable mess Europe has gotten itself into and say, ‘it will be different here; Canada is special; we possess a multicultural exceptionalism that makes us immune to the same failures that have befallen Europe.’ It’s a stance that I find repulsively naive & arrogant.

Canada has no experience of large scale Islamic immigration, and given the lack of former colonies and the progressive zealotry of our current leadership, the country that Canada is most likely to follow in the footsteps of, is Sweden – a country so multiculturally enlightened that neighbour Norway has contingency plans for its societal collapse Norway Warns Sweden Will Collapse, PM Will Defy Geneva Convention To Protect Border, a country so culturally enriched with third world Islamic immigrants that Wikipedia has a page entitled ‘A List of Grenade Attacks in Sweden.’  Thirty seven in 2016 alone.

I used to say that if you want to get a Canandian to do something, shame them into it; make them feel responsible. Clearly this tradition is not reliable enough for Trudeau and his cohort of Islamists using him to establish a beach head from which to start exerting influence over the host society; coercion & state violence are required.

The Four Stages of Islamic Conquest

STAGE 1: INFILTRATION

Muslims begin moving to non-Muslim countries in increasing numbers and the beginning of cultural conflicts are visible, though often subtle.

  • First migration wave to non-Muslim “host” country.
  • Appeal for humanitarian tolerance from the host society.
  • Attempts to portray Islam as a peaceful & Muslims as victims of misunderstanding and racism (even though Islam is not a ‘race’).
  • High Muslim birth rate in host country increase Muslim population.
  • Mosques used to spread Islam and dislike of host country & culture.
  • Calls to criminalize “Islamophobia” as a hate crime.
  • Threatened legal action for perceived discrimination.
  • Offers of “interfaith dialogue” to indoctrinate non-Muslims.

The Next Three

The Progressive Pecking Order

The progressive pecking order is not something that liberals openly admit exists, but when real life events unfold, it emerges for anyone free of impairment to clearly see.

Progressives like Canada’s Trudeau or Germany’s Merkel would no doubt squirm at the idea that their utopian world view could be broken down into a cynical hierarchy of groups of special interests; an identity interest credit rating if you will.

So, if you’re wondering where you are on the progressive totem pole, we’ve put together a helpful guide with real life examples to back it up.

We are confident that once you adopt this application,  you will be able to apply the progressive pecking order model to any situation and navigate through the deceptive narrative of the liberal left. However, we invite everyone to do their own research; look at which group is protected and which group is thrown under the bus in any clash of interests.

For example, if you’re a white male and you’ve been paying attention, you won’t be surprised to discover that you are at the very bottom. That’s because increasingly everything is ultimately your fault; from the inherent stability of western society, to the rule of law, to everybody else’s problems. You carry the burden of shame. You are the white board onto which all healing is to be worked out on. And ultimately, your sins can only be paid for via the currency of cultural cuckoldry, i.e., you need to stand by and watch whilst everyone else fucks your culture.

The only group white men have below them are Christians.

We’re fairly confident most people are aware of the low status Christians enjoy as we forge this brave new world. If not, it is because the MSM has been conspicuously quiet on the plight of Christians particularly in the Middle East, where they have faced a declared genocide at the hands of those our progressive leaders are so eager to import – Muslims.

Shameful Silence: ABC, CBS and NBC Have Ignored Christian Genocide

Is this the End of Christianity in the Middle East? 

Or take the example of Christian bakers who decided they weren’t comfortable making the cake for a gay wedding. Read Story

Do you think that Muslim bakers would ever be held to the same standard of expectation? Of course not. In the progressive pecking order Islam is at the top because of the damage it can do to target societies is unparalleled. And that is what this is ultimately about for cultural Marxists.

Recent real life events such as the sex attacks in Cologne or the Rotherham child abuse scandal demonstrate clearly the hallowed status Muslims enjoy at the expense of other groups, which occupy lower positions in the hierarchy.

In both cases the sexual crimes of Muslim men were covered up by the police and local authorities in order to protect the perceived public image of that group, and in order not to fall onto the sword of political correctness. Ultimately, whichever way you want to dress it up, the safety and interests of women and children were cynically sacrificed in favour of this group.

The championing of large scale Muslim immigration by western societies, given the growing mountain of evidence to its spectacular failure does not make any rational sense, and therefore we have to conclude that those steering this course are either ideologically insane, or more worryingly, part of a sinister scheme to destabilize western societies. This final conclusions only makes sense when you start to consider the role of globalists and their weapon of choice – Islamic immigration, as a part of an aggressive program of cultural Marxism.

Muslim men are top of the pecking order purely because of their potential to destabilize target societies for the globalists.  

Women’s rights together with gay rights are somewhat of a spent force for cultural Marxists. They were the currency of the 60’s, 70’s, & 80’s. Gay is now mainstream; women in western countries are pursuing careers and no longer producing children in significant enough numbers to maintain society. The message being: enjoy yourselves; we’ll import people to wipe your arse when your eighty, and at the same time cynically alter the voting demographic in our favour permanently.

To continue to erode away at western society, new interest groups must be nurtured, which is why Transgender rights are the new frontline for those who wish to reduce western society to a gelatinous grey mush of relativism.  The transgender narrative really is bouncing off the limits of logic.

Despite the reluctance of the left to admit this, we have to credit the swing to the right over recent years in large part to the inconsistency and fallacies the progressive left are coercively attempting to have us adopt; people who possess rationale cannot comfortably consume such indulgences.

So what new frontiers are left to exploit in terms of undermining the stability of society? The final frontier for cultural Marxism in this dimension looks like being the ultimate taboo: pedophilia.

A recent number of articles by progressive flagship publications, including one controversially pulled by Salon, Read More attempting to bring pedophilia in from the cold and sell it as a lifestyle choice, The Pedophile I Could Not Help: He Was Not A Monster suggests that this will be the next battleground for progressives, and a real test of whether populations can be sold anything as progress.

Pedophilia is already the drug of choice for the elites in Washington, London & Hollywood, feeding off ruptured families and ensuring a steady stream of broken souls, whose cost to society is collasal. For cultural Marxists, pedophilia would provide the ultimate weapon against target societies.

Anyone finding this last point hard to accept, needs to ask themselves why the MSM has comprehensively failed to provide coverage of the Trump administration’s arrest of over a thousand pedophiles & child traffickers over the past 6 weeks in operations aimed at rolling up the carpet on a network of child traffickers and pedophile rings that now includes a second tier of a Washington network?

Unreported: Over 1500 pedophile arrests have been made since Trump took office

Since President Donald Trump has been sworn in on Jan. 20, authorities have arrested an unprecedented number of sexual predators involved in child sex trafficking rings in the United States. This should be one of the biggest stories in the national news. Instead, the mainstream media has barely, if at all, covered any of these mass pedophile arrests. This begs the question – why?

As a strong advocate for sex crime victims, I’ve been closely following the pedophile arrests since Trump took office. There have been a staggering 1,500-plus arrests in one short month.

Read More: Why the MSM Is Ignoring Trump’s Sex Trafficking Busts

Roosh V on the Coordinated Attack on Milo

roosh

Having been through the media’s smear ‘n’ slander gauntlet himself, Roosh V gives his insights on the recent coordinated hatchet job against Milo Yiannopoulos (wherein old interview segments were edited to make him appear to be condoning pedophilia) and how the media machine and Deep State Elite destroy dissidents:

Also, an update as Roosh discusses Milo’s press conference:

Suffering Is Good For You

par66386

Scientists working at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) deep below the Swiss countryside who have been using a giant atomic particle Nascar track to search for the elusive God Particle, this week made a startling discover they believe could throw some light on questions that have puzzled mankind for thousands of years.

Though it might be considered somewhat short of the main prize, what scientists working on the Hadron Collider believe they have discovered is that, contrary to what many would have us believe, we are not here on this planet to enjoy our fucking selves.

According to Jean Lapin, the programme’s chief scientist, ‘We may not have found the elusive God particle, but what we have discovered so far suggests that, rather than to be avoided at all cost, suffering and adversity are a natural part of life and a key component to spiritual and personal development.’

This may come as a surprise to many who have been raised within societies where discomfort and suffering are seen as an enemy to be eradicated wherever possible.

As a child I recall the dentist trying to forego anaesthetics for small childhood fillings ‘Just raise you hand if it hurts’ he’d say; it inevitably did. Nowadays they apologies profusely if you can taste the numbing gel they apply to the area before the anaesthetic.

Like harsh physical environments, suffering of a psychological & spiritual nature provides a vehicle for personal growth & development. This is something that is reflected in the experiences of our grandparents, who invested in long term marriages, life long highly skilled trades, and appreciated the value and cost of everything from the food on their plate, to a screwdriver or hammer they would still mourn the lose of years later.

Beyond the anecdotal, the link between trial, suffering, sacrifice and ultimate redemption features repeatedly in Christian scripture. The passages of both the Old & New Testaments are littered with such calls to personal sacrifice as a way of attaining wisdom and becoming closer to God – the trial of Job at the hand of Satan being the most famous, however suffering and trial is found at the core of all Christian teachings.

The Redundancy of God & Fragility of Order

This disconnection also affords atheism. It is a luxury almost exclusively enjoyed by comfortable first world societies. People who get their food out of a packet at a supermarket and are supported by complex welfare systems are largely insulated from the harsh realities of staying alive, and can therefore indulge in fantasies of independence & invincibility, that poorer more vulnerable people, who live close to the practical realities of human existence cannot.

Living in a high-rise in an earthquake zone is the epitome of this mindset.

Our modern mechanized societies are a panic away from shortages and three away from societal collapse. It’s about time we stopped patting ourselves on the back congratulating ourselves for the heady heights we have attained.

I live in a city where people don’t even bother looking up from iPhones in order to cross a side street. That’s because the law has made it my job as a driver to make sure they stay alive. These people aren’t even responsible for their own safety. We have created a generation of people who cannot even cross a fucking road safely. As I helpfully point out to my kids in a way they appreciate: ‘Look kids, if that person was an animal in the jungle, they’d be dead by now.’

What happens when those people run out of food? Their life expectancy becomes that of their battery.

We are woefully unprepared as modern urbanized societies to weather any sort of crisis and this is, by and large, due to the insulation of comfort and air of invincibility we have wrapped ourselves in. It has afforded us a disconnection to the harsh realities of keeping ourselves or families alive and withered our relationship with the spirit.

Those who have only known comfort are in for a viciously steep learning curve if the fabric of society ever buckles. Scratch the veneer of civility and the magma of practical necessity erupts.

Be strong, be everything you can, and appreciate the suffering – it is there to focus the mind, humble the heart, and ultimately to bring us closer to God.

America’s Zombie Left Seeks Civil War

2925596-zat_l4d_05

The left’s appetite for violence is rapidly growing. Hollywood celebrities; pop stars; journalists & activists all seem perfectly comfortable calling for violence against those who do not share their world view. Who could have predicted that the zombies of the apocalypse would end up being those cursed with progressive ideology.

The recent protests and riots that forced Milo Yiannopoulus to cancel his UC Berkeley appearance are just the latest in a catalogue of violence and intimidation the left has been enjoying. There are literally scores of similar incidents Read More  More, More, More,  & More

So desperate are they to cling onto their failing narrative, that they would rather shoot at others trying to flee the stricken ship, than escape themselves. The calls to violence have been unambiguous and emboldened by a mainstream media that has been engaging in very similar rhetoric. Read More

Sarah Silverman was amongst the most recent to call for a coup and martial law to depose President Trump, Read More after Madonna announced during a Women’s March speech in Washington D.C., that she had “thought about blowing up the Whitehouse.” Full Details

These are unhinged children looking for a war with those who do not share their flawed utopian fallacies. David Harbour of the show Stranger Things, whose cast resembled Beavis & Butthead fused with Star Trek: The Next Generation after a nasty beaming down accident, railed and roared against the Trump presidency during an acceptance speech at the 2017 SAG awards, declaring “We will punch some people in the face.”  

However, one thing they fail to appreciate, is that once this genie is out of the bottle, it will not go back in, and their chances of survival in any such situation, are poor to zero.

Outside of sanctuary ghettos like Miami, San Diego, Chicago etc., which are already taking on the identity of siege cities in waiting – full of people with limited resources, where life will be appallingly brutal and desperate for its inhabitants, only defeat awaits.

Hollywood will not hold out like the Alamo; manned by entertainers & actresses whose sense of detached self entitlement is matched only by their inability to know which way round a fucking gun goes. California university students will not emerging from their ‘safe spaces’ to take on Trump’s red pilled right, and win. This is not a Hollywood production where Brad Pitt holds off a division of SS Grenadiers from a limping Sherman tank.

Who do they think makes up the ranks of the conservative right in America? Police officers; Military – current and veterans; rural populations – farmers, bikers, fundamentalist Christians etc. Historically, this sort of match up has never ended favourably for the left. It would be a rerun of the Spanish Civil War produced by the makers of the Walking Dead.

One of the problems for the left is that after decades of cultural Marxism, they no longer produce men capable of fighting a war; they produce emasculated man-bitches with overactive feelings and hormone enhanced entitlement glands. So in order to prosecute their point physically on the street, the left in America employs Black Lives Matter in the same way the left in Europe uses Islamists.  It’s a cynical symbiotic relationship of mutual goals, that really belongs in a David Attenborough documentary. Read More

The left can only push this so far, before they start getting what they seem to be seeking, whether it comes in the form of a crackdown from the Trvmpenfuhrer once he’s finished dealing with everything else, or the rest of America just deciding that they’ve had enough.

militia_01

Waiting at the high water mark for leftist violence: the militias

Was Quebec Terror Attack a False Flag?

images

Was the recent attack and murder of 6 muslim men at a mosque in Quebec city the action of a lone racist gunman or was it something more? The timing and location of this event are highly suspicious, coming only a day after the Prime Minister openly tweeted that Canada would be accepting the refugees banned from the U.S.

While Canada is unmistakably a nation of immigrants with enough room for a few more people, the current post 9/11 clash of cultures has put the western world on edge and the election of Donald Trump to the presidency is proof that unfettered immigration is of concern to the under educated and unemployed American voter.

While the acceptance of refugees into the country is a noble and compassionate policy the driving factors of this mass migration is conveniently ignored.

First, that the West has been bombing the middle east, Afghanistan and parts of Africa for decades and the destruction of these lands leads to the displacement of people.

Second, the clash of cultures created by the waves of immigrants entering our country has led to political push back from a population that sees immigration as a negative.

Third and most importantly, the secretive, almost dishonest way government has sold it’s action policy towards Terrorism and Immigration.

Is immigration the side effect or the reason?

Was the Quebec mosque attack the act of an angry hater or a way to sell more muslim immigration to an already under employed Canadian population?

Journalists at Press For Truth believe there may be a CSIS connection to this story.

What we know for sure is that the RCMP and CSIS have a history of entrapment and the use of false operations for the purpose of affecting public opinion.

Is this latest event one of them?

Lies & Spin in Quebec

fxv101385665_2

In the 18 hours since the attack on the mosque in Quebec in which six people died, the details released have painted two pictures. Original reports from eye witnesses describe two men in balaclavas involved in the shooting; today that has officially changed to only one man – Alexandre Bissonnette. The other suspect, Mohamed Khadir has been identified as a witness.

Witnesses are notoriously unreliable in such incidents, but two men in Balaclavas instead of just one is fairly substantial, considering those witnesses managed to identify an accent as ‘good Quebecois’ and report that the gunmen shouted “Allahu Akbar.”

Last night, shortly after the shooting, a witness who asked to remain anonymous told Radio-Canada that two masked individuals entered the mosque.

“It seemed to me that they had a Québécois accent. They started to fire, and as they shot, they yelled, ‘Allahu akbar!’ The bullets hit people that were praying. People who were praying lost their lives. A bullet passed right over my head.

“There were even kids. There was even a three-year-old who was with his father,” the witness said. Read More

Those early reports have now all but disappeared, to be replaced by the news today that only person is being charged; the other, a witness – supporting the claim that this was potentially Canada’s first Islamophobic terror attack.

‘Two men, both in their 20s, have been arrested. However, just after noon Monday, Sûreté du Québec police tweeted that only one man is considered a suspect; the other is now being treated as a witness. While police are not naming the men or speculating on possible motives, other media outlets have identified them as Laval University students Alexandre Bissonnette and Mohamed El Khadir. La Presse is reporting that Bissonnette is the suspect and is expected to appear in court this afternoon.’ More from Vice

Already, this does not add up. Are we being told the truth, or is this incident is being manipulated to support a crackdown on dissent over Trudeau’s ambitious and zealous globalist agenda to turn Canada into something resembling that progressive dystopian nightmare, Sweden?

Hours after the attack, by then knowing the identities of the attackers, and therefore a fairly good idea of their motives, Trudeau described it as a “terror attack against Muslims”. The implication being that it was carried out by others – Islamophobes. Despite eye witnesses also claiming the attackers shouted “Allahu Akbar.” Read More

Jihad Watch: Quebec mosque mass murderers Alexandre Bissonnette and Mohamed Khadir

In light of the witness statement that they screamed “Allahu akbar,” it is likely that Bissonnette is a convert to Islam, and that this was a case of Muslims firing upon other Muslims whom they deemed heretical: a Sunni-Shia dispute, or adherents of the Islamic State versus opponents of it, or Sunnis firing upon Ahmadiyya — depending on what kind of mosque it is. But there is no basis at this point for the widespread assumption that this was an “Islamophobic” attack.  Read More

All of which was unfolding on the backdrop of Trump’s immigration crackdown, and Trudeau’s moment as the caped saviour of decency.

screen-shot-2017-01-29-at-10-09-40-pm

However, unlike Trudeau, Trump has identified the threat correctly, albeit way ahead of the curve in terms of the imminent threat it posses to the U.S. The threat to Canada is much more serious given the blinkered & voracious appetite the Trudeau government has for importing Islam large scale, as Europe can woefully attest. There, a total blanket ban of Islamic immigration is the only thing that can save the continent from being turned into Bosnia on steroids for their grandchildren.

The Only Picture Canadians Should Need To See To Keep Them Awake

g8sld5mk6cxx

The stakes are high at this stage. Globalist puppet master, George Soros is increasingly out of favour in both Europe and the U.S. The one place he can find a willing errand boy ready to sacrifice his country for an ideological experiment, is in Canada under Trudeau.

Soros must see Canada as crucial to the survival of his global mission at this stage. And a political crackdown on the right within the country would make Canada an ideological counter balance to Trump’s America, essential for Soros in a western world that is waking.

That’s why we should remain sceptical over a narrative which does not add up.

How to not look like a desperate old Hollywood THOT

What not to do case study #1, Madonna, who is pushing 60:

madonna-photoshop

(No, the answer isn’t Photoshop. Photoshop is part of the problem.)

Camille Paglia writes at the Hollywood Reporter about Madonna’s “prolonged midlife crisis” that has her insisting on still dressing in outfits that would have been trampy for her in her early 80s heyday and shrilly screeching “misogyny” when men no longer find that sort of thing sexy.

Paglia helpfully suggests that maybe Madonna ought to look to the longevity of stars who have aged a little more gracefully (not to mention doing so without wearing any ass-exposing dresses), a stance for which the deluded feminazis will no doubt consider Paglia a traitor to her sex rather than, say, a sane person with functioning eyes and a sense of dignity.

If aging stars want to be taken seriously, they must find or recover a mature persona. Stop cannibalizing the young! Scrambling to stay relevant, Madonna is addicted to pointless provocations like her juvenile Instagrams or her trashy outfit with strapped-up bare buttocks and duct-taped nipples at the Metropolitan Museum of Art Gala in May. She has forgotten the legacy of her great precursor, Marlene Dietrich, who retained her class and style to the end of her public life.

If you’re wondering what that Met Gala atrocity looked like:

madonna-met-gala-best-dressed-ftr

(Before you complain that that photo just made you vomit and/or lose your appetite: We know how tough it is to stick to diet-related New Year’s resolutions, so we’re just doing our part to help you keep yours. You’re welcome.)

As a palette cleanser, here’s Marlene Dietrich in her 60s:

marlene-dietrich-1960s

(Plus an interview with Marlene from the same era, in which she’s far saner than Madonna about the whole myth of the sex goddess thing.)

Anyway, Camille continues:

Most disappointing about Madonna’s speech was her collapse into rote male-bashing, which has escalated in Hollywood and surely will increase its cultural isolation from the national audience. The young Madonna was refreshingly sane in her teasing affection for men. Top movie actresses once projected an emotional depth, composure and adult authority that can only be called womanliness. Ingrid Bergman, Susan Hayward, Elizabeth Taylor, Deborah Kerr and Sophia Loren were no victims: They’re strong-willed personalities — onscreen and off. But all of them liked men, and it showed.

Read the rest here.

A service dog walks into a gay bar…

gay-dog-play

Wait, no… wrong gay dog pic… more like this:

gay-poodle

Or this:

dog-with-dildo

Anyway…

We almost missed this late-December gem from David Cole over at Taki’s Magazine, all about the amusing parallels between people sneaking their pets into gay bars while pretending they’re service dogs and dudes wanting to sneak into women’s washrooms while pretending to be transsexuals and the laws that make it all OK whether people like it or not:

…She was direct in her response: “It was less likely anti-straight bias than it was all about the dog. Lots of queer bar owners hate the ADA because of the service-dog regulations.”

I was surprised. “But I thought gays loved their dogs…you know, pampering them, dressing them up in little hats and bow ties and shit.”

“Exactly,” my friend answered. “Queers are always trying to bring their non-service dogs into gay bars, and the owners and managers hate the ADA for the fact that it makes it almost impossible to turn them away. It’s a feeling of government intrusion; the owners feel like their right to run their own business is being violated by a law that demands access in the name of civil rights.”

LOL… oh that’s funny… maybe not for the average run-of-the-mill queer folks, but in light of their activist shit-disturbers, it’s hilariously obtuse. And Cole agrees:

Okay, this is rich. Gay club owners getting pissed off about federal laws mandating access in the name of civil rights. But here’s the thing: The gay bar owners have a point regarding service dogs and the ADA. The law is a hot mess of government illogic. Establishments are allowed to bar any dogs that are not “genuine” service animals (as opposed to simple pets or “emotional support animals”), but, and here comes government doing what it does best—crafting irrational and contradictory rules and regulations—establishments may not demand proof that a dog is a genuine service animal. In other words, you can ban non-service animals, but you are banned from asking for proof that an animal is a service animal; you have to take the customer’s word for it.

Gee, that sounds kinda familiar, doesn’t it?

Read the whole thing here.

Gavin McInnes on “Fake News”

fake-news

Over at Taki’s Magazine, Gavin McInnes gives his take on the war on “fake news”:

Later [Obama] complained to Rolling Stone that we are getting information from “completely different sources.” That’s right. The least competent president in history is telling rape hoax central the merits of the DNC handling all the information from here on out. Barack is ultimately calling for the abolition of facts and suggesting America take up some kind of state-run media the way Britain and Canada have.

Right, because that’s worked out so awesomely for Canada and the UK… as McInnes elaborates on. Read the whole thing here.

PS: What is real “fake news”? Well, there’s two kinds.

1. Quoth McInnes: “as far as a literal definition, I assume it’s those cheap-looking WordPress sites where you can tell it was made by a mentally ill divorced man who hates the world.”

2. The same thing, only made by mentally ill divorced women who hate the world, minus the cheap-looking WordPress site, plus big budgets and paycheques signed by the likes of Ted Turner (if you live in the USA) and/or your friendly local tax collectors (if you live in Canada or the UK).