If last week confirmed anything, it is the apex propaganda status dead children occupy in the collective consciousness. As a parent, there is nothing more disturbing than the sight of dead children; it’s gauranteed to trigger a response that seeks to protect the vulnerable & innocent at any cost.
And that unfortunately is why dead children are employed whenever public opinion is required before a large event or drastic change in policy.
Prior to the Gulf War of 1991, footage of a Kuwaiti nurse was broadcast giving testimony that Iraqi troops had pulled infants from hospital incubators and left them to die. Amnesty International even coroborated the story. Only trouble is, it emerged after the invasion that she was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S and the story was fabricated in order to sell the planned invasion. More Details
More recently, in 2011, a picture of Alan Kurdi, the 3 year old Syrian child found washed up on a Turkish beach acted as the catalyst to open the E.U. doors to over 800,000 migrants.
Alan Kurdi’s death was tragic and just one of many, but the engineered response was audacious to say the least, and you have to question whether the European public would have had the appetite for such a monumental influx of migrants without those pictures.
The abuse metered out to anyone who dared to question the wisdom of what became known as Merkel’s Plan during that period of collective hysteria, was the rage of a manipulated mob.
Last week we were treated to more upsetting footage of gassed and dying children in Syria. And the common theme once again, was that they were being employed in death as a vehicle for a drastic change in policy, namely U.S. military action against Assad.
Stockholm
So contrast that if you will, with the pictures we were shown in the aftermath of the Stockholm truck attack of the same day. We know that children died in that attack, although even their mention was kept to a minimum.
Instead of the stack of boys and their contorted limbs, we were shielded from the brutal and appalling reality of the attack by pictures of tarpaulins covering the victims.
Why is that? Why do we get to see dead Syrian children whilst from seeing dead European children?
Clearly, just as the footage of dead Syrian children is aimed at convincing us of the need for more war and mass immigration programmes, the fear is that showing us the pictures of dead Swedish children will greatly dampen our appetite for more Islamic immigration. And that is ultimately what this is about.
I came across raw photos of the victims of the Stockholm Islamic truck attack on a Facebook group, and they are truly appalling. Warning: graphic
This is what the victims of progressive immigration policies look like. This is what the victims of imported Islamic terror look like.
The inconsistency and double standards employed by the MSM; our progressive politicians & their globalist masters provides clear testimony as to their agenda.
They don’t want us to see these images in case we suddenly wake up in large enough numbers to the madness they are engaged in. This is Merkel’s tax, and this is will be the fruit of Trudeau’s policies also.
If we stop the endless cycle of regime change and war, we end the flow of legitimate refugees and the army of economic migrants that acompny them.
People seem unable or unwilling to see the connection between the two, but that I believe is because they steadfastly refuse to admit that both are parts of a globalist agenda to destroy the nation state and the elements that hold it together.
That is why nationalism is a dirty word. Because without it, we’ll all shuffle off quietly to the slaughterhouse accepting this as normal.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s strike on a Syrian airbase last week caught everyone off guard. The situation rapidly disintegrated into military action after a chemical attack on Syrian civilians last Tuesday.
Trump was reportedly moved to action by the images of dead and dying children, despite widespread skepticism surrounding the origins of the attack and a comprehensive appreciation of how ‘fake news’ works.
So how could Trump, the red-pilled candiadate who promised to end the cycle of regime change and war, suddenly start implementing what to the untrained eye looks a lot like Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy?
Of course, the only people who could initiate such a policy under a Trump presidency, are the artchitects of that policy – the Deep State, and in order for that to happen, Trump’s administration would have to be compromised.
But let’s start at the beginning with the background players and their motives & interests. The intelligence services and western media has stated that this was the work of Assad. The first question people asked themselves was, what would Assad get out of such a move? And the answer is: Nothing.
As the NYT stated in an article that same day: A chemical weapons attack, if carried out by the government, would be a brazen statement of impunity, coming during a major international meeting in Brussels where officials are debating whether the European Union and other countries will contribute billions of dollars for reconstructing Syria if it is presided over by a government run by Mr. Assad.
With Russian & Iranian support, the Syrian army has been making sustained gains in its six year civil war. To launch a chemical attack on civilians that is sure to draw the attention of Western nations makes no strategic sense at all. However, a timely attack of this nature richly benefits those who seek to unseat Assad – the rebels and the Deep State.
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said on a trip to Turkey that the “longer-term status of President Assad will be decided by the Syrian people.” In New York, US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley was even stronger about the Trump administration’s decision not to push for Assad’s departure. “Our priority is no longer to sit and focus on getting Assad out,”
In an article for Disobedient Media this week, William Craddick wrote, It is strategically counterintuitive to assume that Bashar al-Assad would engage in a chemical attack on Syrians just one week after figures in the American government expressed the opinion that they would be willing to allow him to remain in power. The Syrian government no longer even possesses chemical weapons, as the United Nations and U.S. Department of State have already confirmed. Read Full Article
There’s also been broad speculation that the release of chemical weapons was the result of a dump being hit rather than the gas being dropped by the regime.
On Thursday night, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said the U.S. intelligence community assessed with a “high degree of confidence” that the Syrian government had dropped a poison gas bomb on civilians in Idlib province. But a number of intelligence sources have made contradictory assessments, saying the preponderance of evidence suggests that Al Qaeda-affiliated rebels were at fault, either by orchestrating an intentional release of a chemical agent as a provocation or by possessing containers of poison gas that ruptured during a conventional bombing raid.
Rebels Are Known To Have Possessed And Used Chemical Weapons In Syria For Some Time
While the Syrian government surrendered their chemical arms stockpiles for destruction several years ago, evidence indicates that rebel groups in Syria have ramped up their own supplies of the deadly weapons systems and have not hesitated to deploy them in combat. On June 23rd, 2014, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Syrian government had completed the removal of all chemical weapons from the country per and agreement they had reached with the United States. The handover was confirmed by the United Nations Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. While the Syrian government have surrendered their chemical weapons, rebel groups have acquired and used them in increasing numbers. Read More
The authenticity of the footage of the attack, which proports to show aid workers treating victims of Sarin gas without the necessary protective equipment – a practice that would have put them in physical danger, has also been brought into question.
2013: Repeat Offenders
The last time there was a chemical attack broadly attributed to Assad in Syria back in 2013, it turned out that rebel forces were responsible. But at the time a concerted effort was made by the Obama admin & western liberal media to pin responsibility on Assad.
According to the United Nations 2013 mission led by Carla del Ponte:
“evidence from casualties and medical staff indicated that rebel forces in the civil war had used the deadly nerve agent sarin.
‘Our investigators have been in neighbouring countries interviewing victims, doctors and field hospitals, and there are strong, concrete suspicions, but not yet incontrovertible proof, of the use of sarin gas,’ said Del Ponte in an interview with Swiss-Italian television.
‘This was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the government authorities.’ Read More
Trump Playing 4D Chess?
The Alt Right seems to have split into two camps on Trump’s Syria strikes; those who support the man before all else – loyal Deplorables who will back Trump regardless, and those who see the war against globalism as the real battle; for whom attacking Syria singals that the integrity of this administration has been compromised in some way.
Those loyally supporting Trump through this believe that he is playing what is referred to as 4D Chess – the playing of multiple interconected games on different boards at one time and conveying signals via a range of theatres to a variety of players, as explained by Charles Hugh-Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,
A signal is a form of communication, but its cost must be high to be persuasive. A signal can provide information on intent, depth of commitment, willingness to accept risk and much more. And is often intended to communicate different things to different audiences. The Media’s Missing The Point: Syria, Empire, & The Power Of Signaling
The one thing that Trump has managed with the strike against Assad, is to dispel the Deep State & Democratic Party narrative that he is in the pocket of Vladimir Putin. Although whether this episode was intended to that end, seems questionable.
A War in Heaven: Bannonites Vs Globalist Errand Boys
For anyone who supported Trump to this point, last week’s developments are troubling. News of a power struggle within the Whitehouse between cheif strategist Steve Bannon and Ivanka’s husband & Trump senior advisor, Jared Kushner have surfaced. And those fears of a compromise can’t be helped by reports that it was Ivanka who inspired her father to act on the footage of the aftermath.
The Daily Beast reported that fighting had been nonstop between Bannon and Kushner for weeks and that the two often clashed face-to-face. One official told the news outlet that Bannon said Kushner was trying to “shiv him and push him out the door.” They said Bannon recently vented about Kushner “being a ‘globalist’ and a ‘cuck.'”
If someone wanted to get to Trump, they would need to do it through his inner circle. Is the anti-globalist Bannon being pushed out of the nest by the cuck Kushner, who has the ear of Ivanka and her father? It would explain a lot.
Yes, the real story surrounding the Russian hacking allegations which began if you remember during the election campaign, isn’t that it happened, but that the Deep State and their Democratic Ramoras continue to push this narrative without the presence of ANY evidence. Should we be skeptical? Absolutely. Don’t forget, these are the people who took us to war in Iraq based on fabricated evidence of WMD’s.
In fact the deeper they dig this hole of a lie, the greater the danger of having the walls fall in on them. And that’s what appears to be happening to former National Security Advisor, Susan Rice.
As noted last night, Journalist and author Mike Cernovich dropped an exclusive bombshell – naming Obama’s National Security Advisor Susan Rice as the official responsible for the ‘unmasking’ of the incoming Trump team during ‘incidental’ surveillance. This was apparently discovered after the White House Counsel’s office reviewed Rice’s document log requests. Full Article
It would appear that Rice unmasked the identity of the Trump team against protocol, and for what appear to be purely partisan reasons, if the ‘incidental surveillance’ narrative is to be believed at all.
Conservative Ken Doll look-a-likee and bard of the red pilled right, Tucker Carlson was having none of it, and started his nightly show already in kill mode.
Immediately after which, former State Department official & foreign policy advisor under Obama, David Tafori had the unenviable task of trying to defend the increasingly tired sounding narrative to Carlson, who by this stage was marauding high on the blood of virgins, duplicitous democrats and whatever else he could get hold of. Please watch
And how did CNN respond to the revelation that Rice disclosed the identities of individuals caught unintentionally in a surveillance sweep – that is based remember on the allegation of Russian interference that originated from Clinton campaign sources – and for which, to date, they have failed to provide any evidence for?
Last night, Lemon began “CNN Tonight” with an announcement that the Rice report a “fake scandal ginned up by right-wing media and Trump” that he would not be baited into justifying with coverage.
“On this program tonight, we will not insult your intelligence by pretending,” it’s legitimate, he said. “Nor will we aid and abet the people trying to misinform you, the American people, by creating a diversion. Not going to do it.”
And here is Tucker Carlson challenging Democratic congressman and House Intelligence Committee member, Adam Schiff to back up his allegations by stating publically on camera that he knows for a fact that the Russian government hacked the election.
A lesbian is heartlessly pushed to the back by Justin’s rampant lust for Islam
Well, we didn’t need a guy with a camcoder in Winnipeg to tell us that Trudeau was a scumbag, but full credit to that man for opening the dialogue. #Scumbag
Josh Sigurdson of the World Alternative Media confronted an uncomfortable looking Trudeau on his carbon tax policy at a press conference, calling him a ‘scumbag’ and declaring ‘shame on you and your globalist counterparts’ as he was ushered from the room.
This incident was the latest sign that the Canadian public are waking up to the reality that life under Trudeau is less like going out with the dreamiest guy on campus, and more a futuristic distopian novel about life under a tyranny of decency; delivered in warm tones by the state broadcaster, which is now actively listing criticism of Islam as ‘Islamophobia’ CBC now labels comments criticizing Islam as “Islamophobic”
Sigurdson set an example to all Canadians unhappy with Trudeau’s plan to spend hundreds of billions of dollars turning the country into Sweden – a failed state in waiting. This ‘dialogue’ is essential; Trudeau needs to be told what a scumbag he is.
Carbon Tax? Trudeau is a cultural cuckold & carrier for the Islam virus
Whether we are talking about carbon tax, generous foriegn aid or mass Islamic immigration, progressive zealots like Trudeau are consumate cucks for whom ideology trumps both reality and elected office.
If Trudeau and his globalist cohorts want to destroy this country, then it is our duty to make it as difficult as possible for them; lay down a heavy barrage of hashtags on his globalist ass for the weaponized autism of 4 Chan to turn its collective mind upon; Tweet him @JustinTrudeau; tag him on Facebook. E.g. Who was this photo taken with? A: Trudeau #scumbag.
We made Brexit & Trump a reality, so we should be able to take this clown down, no problem. #Scumbag #MCGA #PresidentPoolBoy
As we recently pointed out in The Progressive Pecking Order, there is a hierachical bias that’s being engineered, and last week’s Westminister Bridge Islamic terror attack in London provided an anatomy of that bias.
Yes, because only when Muslims go on a murderous rampage, are Muslims the real victims… Because of what could happen to them if there was a backlash. Not that there ever is really. But just in case you were having any feelings of anger over yet another attack by adherents of a religion that have been given a home, the liberal media are there to make you feel so utterly ashamed of any natural feelings you might harbour, that you’ll shove them back inside yourself and feel suitably bad for ever having them.
Shame & coercion, it’s a both a bitch, and a staple.
After each attack – which we now have to count like Hollywood sequels: Paris – Charlie Hebdo; Paris 2: Bataclan; London – 7/7 etc., the liberal press rummage through their empty bag of excuses like the sniveling mother of a habitual criminal looking for a pack of tissues, ‘he’s a good boy really, just misunderstood.’
But, when on the rare occasion the gunman actually turns out to be white and the motive can be pinned anywhere near the right wing – like a tail on a donkey at a ketamine party for six year olds, – ‘anywhere near the body will do kid.’
We always hear that we shouldn’t blame the actions of an individual on the larger group they belong to. So shouldn’t we extend the same usual reluctance to tar a group for the actions of a ‘tiny minority’, to Conservatives and those on the Alt-Right? Of course not, are you fucking mad? That luxury is reserved for members of the religion of permanent offence and special needs – Islam.
What about all that stuff in the Quran about killing the unbelievers, and those who insult the prophet? They get a pass; that’s taken out of context. We don’t talk about that.
Instead we get: ‘Islam promotes peace’, or my favourite ‘Islam has nothing to do with terror’ as Hillary Clinton declared. These people have de-coupled from reality and clearly expect the rest of us to come along for the ride.
We are asked to fact check our ‘fake news’ with Buzzfeed, but never to fact check the lies we are told about Islam.
The Right’s Perceived Future Crimes
What has been introduced in its place are the hate crimes of the right in the eyes of the left. Any whiff of association and you are guilty, not only of whatever crime it is, but all society’s ills.
These crimes can even be perceived potential future crimes rather than actual real world historical examples, as in the case of Donald Trump. E.g. Trump is Hitler; he’s literally going to destroy the world; he’s going to be be impeached any day now for his racism and war crimes.
The left wasn’t interested in Hillary’s rap sheet that read like that of an inner city gangbanger, or that she was under three separate FBI investigations during her campaign. They were too busy fabricating something that could sink Trump.
Yeah, But White Christian Terrorism Is Just As Bad.
No it’s fucking not. White terrorism is a crime so rare you need a time machine to connect all the dots. I’ll help you out: Unibomber…Timothy McVeigh… Anders Breivik… Dylan Roof. Unlike Islamic terror, which requires a hand tally counter, good carpal tunnels, and lots of free time. Those guys are killing round-the-clock faster than you can count. The comparison is ludicruous and serves only to highlight the batshit insane bias that passes for reality on the left.
Fact check: In 627AD, the Prophet Mohammed oversaw the execution of 600-900 men and boys. More Details
Fact Check: Islamic scripture permits a follower to lie and deceive if the goal is the establishment of an Islamic society? More Details
Fact Check: Islam preaches peace, and that killing is wrong, but the people who cite this verse often fail to mention that this courtesy is not extended to non-Muslims. More Details
Fact Check: Non-believers living under an Islamic society are permitted three options: convert, pay protection money or die. More Details
On that reckoning, Anders Breivik is a better role model than the Prophet Mohammed.
It feels like we somewhere there was a shift in the fabric of time and now we are living in an alternate dimension, where up is down; in is out, and people who follow the teachings of a murderous warlord, are all about peace despite the mountain of stone cold evidence to the contrary.
To call Islam a religion, let alone a ‘religion of peace’, is generous at best. It’s a political system of conquest based on the deception and subjegation of host societies. I would suggest everyone learns something about what Islam actually teaches before they agree to opening the gates any further. We have a working model of the collapse mass Islamic immigration brings in France, Belgium, Sweden and Germany. What makes you think it will play out any differently in North America?
Hoping for the best in the face of overwhelming contrary evidence is recklessly dangerous. Politicians & supporters who wish to continue with such policies should be forced implement them at gunpoint. That is how hard we should make it for them to do this.
It has gone something like this: we have been saying, ‘Western liberal societies have adopted suicidal immigration policies which are sowing the seeds for an ethnic war that will look like Bosnia on steroids.’
And then the left go: ‘Your hate speech is offensive and needs to be silenced with coercion and violence. Look at this person everyone, they are a fascist!’
Then we go, ‘Look, you are going to need to engage at some point. Trump’s victory, like the Brexit referendum before it, was a clear rejection of the failed progressive policies of the last 20 years.’
And then the left goes: ‘La la la la la la. Can’t hear you racist fascist xenophobe! Go away.’
So we go away and start organizing.
Then the left starts wondering. ‘Why’s everyone going fascist? Can’t be anything that we’ve done; everything we do is right; they must be bad people who were just looking for an excuse to be a fascist.’
So, after many many years now of attempting to engage and explain to liberals and leftists what is happening and why. I think it’s best if we just admit that what they fear is true: The fascists are coming and they are most probably going to want to kill you.
The rise of the right has nothing to do with ramming failed progressive policies down the throats of populations who increasingly don’t buy the narrative, and everything to do with us just being ‘bad bastards’ who have been waiting all our lives for the opportunity to start killing people who just want to create the perfect world for everyone.
After some contemplation in the wake of the passing in parliament of Liberal M.P Iqra Khalid’s M103 Islamaphobia motion, we would like to thank her.
We’re confident that Khalid and her Islamist colleagues together with President Pool Boy and his clique of white liberal cuckolds, envisaged the effect of their motion to act as a wet blanket under which they would quietly smother any growing unease at the rapid Islamization of Canada in its infancy.
Wrong!
Instead, it would appear that the effect of this motion, which is legally described as a guard dog without teeth (why have one then?) has had completely the opposite effect, and woken a sleeping population to both the creeping threat of domestic Islam and the mental health issues of progressives.
In fact, here’s a prediction that is easy to make: M103 will lead to a ten fold increase in ‘Islamophobia.’
Khalid’s motion to ‘quell’ Islamophobia without even a legal definition is an insult to the rationale of a rapidly growing number of Canadians. People are red pilling on social media faster than Ebola in the Congo basin; nationalist movements around the world are turning their gaze and their guns on progressive Canada, as it skips off down the path from grandma’s house, that leads it to the same sorry fate as Sweden.
If Khalid’s intention was to bring the special needs status already enjoyed by Islam to the attention of all Canadians, she could not have planned it better.
The tide is turning against Trudeau’s zealotry and progressive agenda in the wake of M103 even faster than we could have dreamt. And for all of this, we have Iqra Khalid & M103 to thank.
Not only do both Khalid and Trudeau appear to have overplayed their hand, but we are confident that, once the public opinion stats start rolling in, we will see some serious back peddling from the Trudeau government in an attempt to avoid defeat at the next General Election in two years, which may well include having to throw Khalid under the bus to do so.
M103 is also acting as rocket fuel to the Conservative leadership race; the passing of M103 has chemically separated the cucks like Michael Chong, from pragmatic nationalists like Kellie Leitch. We predict that Conservative Party membership will see a sharp rise in wake of the passing of this motion; instantaneously transforming dormant laissez-faire conservatives into highly motivated activists. So, from the swelling ranks of the red pilled right of Canada, Thank You.
Progressives like Trudeau are merely the worker bees of cultural Marxism, carrying the eggs of Islam into the hive to accelerate the colony’s collapse. But when it comes to weaponizing public opinion against you and your party, Iqra Khalid is the queen; and Canadians are now seeing this in large enough numbers to make a difference.
You have sown the wind, and now you shall reap the whirlwind.
By this point it should not be news to many that elements within Trudeau’s liberal government are putting forward a motion, that they say is aimed at tackling, or more specifically, ‘quelling’ the ‘hatred and fear’ associated with Islamaphobia.
M-103, which was tabled by Iqra Khalid in December 2016 and calls on the government to ‘recognize the need to quell the increasing public climate of hate and fear’ had its first debate in the house last week. During which Khalid compared the faux plight of modern Muslims with the Holocaust for Jews.
Mississauga, Ont., MP Iqra Khalid, who led debate in the House of Commons tonight on M-103, said the common definition of Islamophobia is “the irrational hate of Muslims that leads to discrimination,” and that her motion must not remove the word.
“I will not do so, any more than I would speak to the Holocaust and not mention that the overwhelming majority of victims were six million followers of the Jewish faith and that anti-Semitism was the root cause of the Holocaust,” she said. “We cannot address a problem if we fail to call it by its true name.” Read Article
There are a couple of things however that should concern every Canadian citizen.
Firstly, let’s just get into the semantics here for a moment, as not surprisingly, that’s where a lot of motions and laws actually lie. Quelling hate involves forcefullness & implies violence; whilst quelling fear requires an opposite kind of skill set: reassurance.
No prizes for guessing which interpretation the anti-Islamaphobia motion will offer any progressive lucky enough to possess it in their arsenal.
Secondly, there exists no legal definition of what Islamaphobia actually is… No really; there is no clear definition. Surely you would need a legal definition before basing a motion upon it? Apparently not, not in a world made up of feelings and ideological imperative.
The National Council of Canadian Muslims did offer a definition which could provide some reassurance.
In an op-ed on CBC’s website, Amira Elghawaby, the communications director at the National Council of Canadian Muslims provided a definition to the term Islamophobia… as referring to the irrational fear and hatred of Muslims, which can lead to discrimination and violence. Read Full Article
Like a growing number of people, I can safely demonstrate that my fear of Islam is completely rational and based on a mountain of evidence streaming in daily from across the liberal Western world as to the incompatibility of Islam and its adherents with our values and societal model. This evidence is undeniably made up of a culture of violence, intolerance and intimidation. So you have to ask yourself, why would progressive governments be seeking to offer protected status to such a flawed and destructive import?
The nearest thing the red pilled right actually have is a critical definition often wrongly accreditted to the late Christopher Hitchens.
But we doubt this is the definition the Liberal Party will be operating from.
As we have previously covered in Trudeau’s Tyranny of Decency, the recorded number of attacks against Muslims or their property in Canada is lower than it is for Jews, or even Catholics. Therefore, the desire for anti-Islamaphobia legislation must be politically based, as the figures do not support legal intervention to address a crisis of any recognizable size.
Who would look at Europe and say, ‘Let’s have some of that over here’?
We need to call out the Islamists establishing a foothold in Canada. I personally know many progressive Canadaians who are able to look at the undeniable but avoidable mess Europe has gotten itself into and say, ‘it will be different here; Canada is special; we possess a multicultural exceptionalism that makes us immune to the same failures that have befallen Europe.’ It’s a stance that I find repulsively naive & arrogant.
Canada has no experience of large scale Islamic immigration, and given the lack of former colonies and the progressive zealotry of our current leadership, the country that Canada is most likely to follow in the footsteps of, is Sweden – a country so multiculturally enlightened that neighbour Norway has contingency plans for its societal collapse Norway Warns Sweden Will Collapse, PM Will Defy Geneva Convention To Protect Border, a country so culturally enriched with third world Islamic immigrants that Wikipedia has a page entitled‘A List of Grenade Attacks in Sweden.’ Thirty seven in 2016 alone.
I used to say that if you want to get a Canandian to do something, shame them into it; make them feel responsible. Clearly this tradition is not reliable enough for Trudeau and his cohort of Islamists using him to establish a beach head from which to start exerting influence over the host society; coercion & state violence are required.
The Four Stages of Islamic Conquest
STAGE 1: INFILTRATION
Muslims begin moving to non-Muslim countries in increasing numbers and the beginning of cultural conflicts are visible, though often subtle.
First migration wave to non-Muslim “host” country.
Appeal for humanitarian tolerance from the host society.
Attempts to portray Islam as a peaceful & Muslims as victims of misunderstanding and racism (even though Islam is not a ‘race’).
High Muslim birth rate in host country increase Muslim population.
Mosques used to spread Islam and dislike of host country & culture.
Calls to criminalize “Islamophobia” as a hate crime.
Threatened legal action for perceived discrimination.
Offers of “interfaith dialogue” to indoctrinate non-Muslims.
The progressive pecking order is not something that liberals openly admit exists, but when real life events unfold, it emerges for anyone free of impairment to clearly see.
Progressives like Canada’s Trudeau or Germany’s Merkel would no doubt squirm at the idea that their utopian world view could be broken down into a cynical hierarchy of groups of special interests; an identity interest credit rating if you will.
So, if you’re wondering where you are on the progressive totem pole, we’ve put together a helpful guide with real life examples to back it up.
We are confident that once you adopt this application, you will be able to apply the progressive pecking order model to any situation and navigate through the deceptive narrative of the liberal left. However, we invite everyone to do their own research; look at which group is protected and which group is thrown under the bus in any clash of interests.
For example, if you’re a white male and you’ve been paying attention, you won’t be surprised to discover that you are at the very bottom. That’s because increasingly everything is ultimately your fault; from the inherent stability of western society, to the rule of law, to everybody else’s problems. You carry the burden of shame. You are the white board onto which all healing is to be worked out on. And ultimately, your sins can only be paid for via the currency of cultural cuckoldry, i.e., you need to stand by and watch whilst everyone else fucks your culture.
The only group white men have below them are Christians.
We’re fairly confident most people are aware of the low status Christians enjoy as we forge this brave new world. If not, it is because the MSM has been conspicuously quiet on the plight of Christians particularly in the Middle East, where they have faced a declared genocide at the hands of those our progressive leaders are so eager to import – Muslims.
Or take the example of Christian bakers who decided they weren’t comfortable making the cake for a gay wedding. Read Story
Do you think that Muslim bakers would ever be held to the same standard of expectation? Of course not. In the progressive pecking order Islam is at the top because of the damage it can do to target societies is unparalleled. And that is what this is ultimately about for cultural Marxists.
Recent real life events such as the sex attacks in Cologne or the Rotherham child abuse scandal demonstrate clearly the hallowed status Muslims enjoy at the expense of other groups, which occupy lower positions in the hierarchy.
In both cases the sexual crimes of Muslim men were covered up by the police and local authorities in order to protect the perceived public image of that group, and in order not to fall onto the sword of political correctness. Ultimately, whichever way you want to dress it up, the safety and interests of women and children were cynically sacrificed in favour of this group.
The championing of large scale Muslim immigration by western societies, given the growing mountain of evidence to its spectacular failure does not make any rational sense, and therefore we have to conclude that those steering this course are either ideologically insane, or more worryingly, part of a sinister scheme to destabilize western societies. This final conclusions only makes sense when you start to consider the role of globalists and their weapon of choice – Islamic immigration, as a part of an aggressive program of cultural Marxism.
Muslim men are top of the pecking order purely because of their potential to destabilize target societies for the globalists.
Women’s rights together with gay rights are somewhat of a spent force for cultural Marxists. They were the currency of the 60’s, 70’s, & 80’s. Gay is now mainstream; women in western countries are pursuing careers and no longer producing children in significant enough numbers to maintain society. The message being: enjoy yourselves; we’ll import people to wipe your arse when your eighty, and at the same time cynically alter the voting demographic in our favour permanently.
To continue to erode away at western society, new interest groups must be nurtured, which is why Transgender rights are the new frontline for those who wish to reduce western society to a gelatinous grey mush of relativism. The transgender narrative really is bouncing off the limits of logic.
Despite the reluctance of the left to admit this, we have to credit the swing to the right over recent years in large part to the inconsistency and fallacies the progressive left are coercively attempting to have us adopt; people who possess rationale cannot comfortably consume such indulgences.
So what new frontiers are left to exploit in terms of undermining the stability of society? The final frontier for cultural Marxism in this dimension looks like being the ultimate taboo: pedophilia.
A recent number of articles by progressive flagship publications, including one controversially pulled by Salon, Read More attempting to bring pedophilia in from the cold and sell it as a lifestyle choice, The Pedophile I Could Not Help: He Was Not A Monster suggests that this will be the next battleground for progressives, and a real test of whether populations can be sold anything as progress.
Pedophilia is already the drug of choice for the elites in Washington, London & Hollywood, feeding off ruptured families and ensuring a steady stream of broken souls, whose cost to society is collasal. For cultural Marxists, pedophilia would provide the ultimate weapon against target societies.
Anyone finding this last point hard to accept, needs to ask themselves why the MSM has comprehensively failed to provide coverage of the Trump administration’s arrest of over a thousand pedophiles & child traffickers over the past 6 weeks in operations aimed at rolling up the carpet on a network of child traffickers and pedophile rings that now includes a second tier of a Washington network?
Since President Donald Trump has been sworn in on Jan. 20, authorities have arrested an unprecedented number of sexual predators involved in child sex trafficking rings in the United States. This should be one of the biggest stories in the national news. Instead, the mainstream media has barely, if at all, covered any of these mass pedophile arrests. This begs the question – why?
As a strong advocate for sex crime victims, I’ve been closely following the pedophile arrests since Trump took office. There have been a staggering 1,500-plus arrests in one short month.
This is what the victims of progressive immigration policies look like. This is what the victims of imported Islamic terror look like.
Aristotle's Bench Press 