VICE Media is FUBAR

As If the devastating fires that destroyed thousands of homes in Fort McMurray wasn’t enough for the residents of Northern Alberta, suffering locals have to watch themselves be the butt of the Joke in VICE Media’s latest TV show, FUBAR: Age of Computer.

Watch Here

Based on the cult film FUBAR made in 2002, Age of Computer is a rehash of the same characters doing the same thing; getting wasted and being stupid, but the joke comes at the tax payers expense.

Funded in part by Canadian Arts and Film grants, FUBAR not only makes light out of the tragedy in Fort Mac by implying it was the characters themselves that started the fires but they also go about exploiting the system that supported the survivors.

Fans of the show, and there are many, love the characters (I was once one of them) but unlike the personalities they portray, the actors (Dave Lawrence and Paul Spence) are not at all like the real people they make fun of. They are left wing hipsters who are too cool for regular people.

The original film was a Canadian hit because the performances were so realistic. Yet now, as is true with most Vice Media productions, the subject IS the joke. While Bob and Doug McKenzie (of SCTV fame) were affable, fun, good natured hosers, the actors in FUBAR are not. Instead of  having fun with the Canadian banger stereotype, they are making fun of the Canadian head banger. The very people who watch the show. To Spence and Lawrence they are losers to be exploited for financial gain.

Apart from Michael Dowse (the director and co-creator of FUBAR) who has made a name for himself since his directorial debut making films world wide, Lawrence and Spence have had a lacklustre career which is why they had to return to the only thing they were good at; making fun of others.

It should be noted that the trio (who now reside in Quebec) went out of their way to include and be respectful towards French culture by creating an unnecessary character who is French Canadian. Presumably because the TV show was shot in Montreal and not Calgary where the show takes place. In Canada it’s ok to make fun of Alberta (English Canadians) but not Quebec (French Canadians) because that would be racist.

In light of VICE Media’s current sexual harassment issues (that appear to be long running and systemic) it is not hard to understand their Machiavellian business model. Appeal to the consumer (and young attractive staff) by presenting a false image. That of progressive, sensitive, socially conscious, equality minded, justice warrior journalism. When in fact, nothing could be further from the truth.

Under VICE’s bogus appearance lies a pair of cut throat business men in Shane Smith and Suroosh Alvi who stabbed their co-founder Gavin McGinnis in the proverbial back like Brutus killed Caeser in the Roman senate 2000 years ago. When the time came, the two saw that the genius behind VICE magazine’s success had to go and forced him out by hostile take over. Today, VICE Media is reported to be worth 5.5 billion.

It is an empire built on the humiliation of the very people who read, watch and consume their products. Under the premise of Journalism or ‘telling peoples stories’, VICE media engages in the mondo ‘Elephant Man’ type exploitation of it’s subjects.

The ‘Look at this person, his life is hard, poor guy. Aren’t you glad you’re not him?’ kind of story telling.

Just like VICE Media, (and the Canadian arts funding bodies that helped produce it) FUBAR: Age of Computer is a tone deaf, pile of insulting garbage.

Trudeau’s ‘Hug a Terrorist’ Program For Returning ISIS Fighters

 

 

Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government reached a new plateau of transcendental thinking, when it announced that Canadians returning from fighting for ISIS in Syria & Iraq will be ‘re-habilitated’ rather than prosecuted or killed.

Whilst most other Western nations have stated that the only practical solution is for their domestic ISIS fighters to be killed in country and not return, the Trudeau government is offering hugs and hot chocolate to those who have been busy decapitating children in the name of Allah.

U.S. Special Envoy, Brett McGurk stated explicitly on a recent visit to Syria. “Our mission is to make sure that any foreign fighter who is here, who joined ISIS from a foreign country and came into Syria, that they will die here in Syria.”

France, too, is working to eradicate its jihadis overseas. A Wall Street Journal investigation published in May quoted French and Iraqi officials describing French special forces co-operating with Iraqi units to hunt down and kill French jihadis.

Whilst The Sunday Times reports that Britain’s Special Air Service, SAS, has been given a “kill list” of British jihadis, including notorious ISIS recruiter and convert Sally Jones.

U.K government minister Rory Stewart said “Converts who leave Britain to fight for the terror group are guilty of horrific acts and the only way of dealing with them is to kill them “in almost every case”.

Read Full Article

These countries, all of which have extensive experience at the business end of Islamic terrorism, appreciate that this is the only practical solution; to allow these people back into their countries is to expose their populations to almost certain acts of terror.

Canadian state apparatus, CBC pimped the official line dutifully when it echoed the statement made by Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale  that “Canada does not engage in death squads.”

Read Full Article

The irony that this statement should be made by a minister with the title of Public Safety Minister would be Pythonesque if it wasn’t so perverse.

Trudeau’s Liberals may find the prospect of killing Canadian Islamic fighters – which are estimated to number 200 in number – too distasteful to contemplate, but the Minister for Public Safety is clearly willing to provide safe passage for Islamic death squads returning home after defeat in Syria & Iraq, who will then be free to target Canadians at home as they have previously threatened.

None of this makes sense of course unless you are ideologically addled progressive for whom ideals trump reality and the safety of your citizens, whom you have been elected to protect and serve.

Canadians should be concerned that a rich kid like Trudeau, raised on pure ideology, should be in a position to knowingly endanger their families’ safety for the sake of a political indulgence.

If these returning Islamic fighters decide after the hugs and generous welfare offerings, that what Allah really wants is a truck attack on pedestrians, or a knife attack on shoppers, then Trudeau and his government of progressive impairment will be complicit in any deaths that follow.

Trudeau’s Orgy of Cultural Self-Loathing Continues

In the wake of the Edmonton Islamic terror attack, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau issued a statement saying that we all need to embrace diversity. He failed to use the words radical Islam, preferring to describe it as a generic terror attack driven by the boogie monster known as hate.

“We cannot – and will not – let violent extremism take root in our communities. We know that Canada’s strength comes from our diversity, and we will not be cowed by those who seek to divide us or promote fear.”    Full Statement

Well, the first thing to obviously point out in that statement is that, it is his government who has embarked upon a program of mass Islamic immigration; no one else is more responsible for Islamic extremism taking root within Canadian society. It seems ludicrous to search for a culprit anywhere else – like O.J Simpson saying that he’s looking for the real murderer.

Trudeau’s government has flooded cities like Edmonton & Calgary with such people, and in doing so has single-handedly sown the seeds that are now bearing their murderous fruit.

 Contrast that with his statement after the Quebec mosque attack:

“We condemn this terrorist attack on Muslims in a centre of worship and refuge… Muslim-Canadians are an important part of our national fabric, and these senseless acts have no place in our communities, cities and country.”     Full Statement

After the Quebec attack, he went to great lengths to highlight that this was an attack on Muslims, but after Edmonton, completely fails to mention the involvement of Islam despite the attack being carried out by a Muslim with an ISIS flag in the van.

However, the day after the Edmonton Islamic terror attack he took to social media to share a post which condemned ‘White Supremacy’. No one is really expected to know how Trudeau’s mind works at this stage, but don’t forget this is the same national leader who said that ISIS could only be defeated with love.

Trudeau is the product of his generation & a privileged upbringing; he does not live in reality, but a world of ideology; he is stupid rather than evil (the only two options available to him), and this sort of inconsistency betrays his bias.

In following the European model of ‘cultural enrichment’ whilst attempting to silence those who speak out against it, Trudeau is sowing the seeds of Islamic Jihad in Canada for future generations.

It’s not like we don’t know how this plays out; the experiment has already been run in Europe, where it can be safely declared a resounding failure. Who in their right mind would look at somewhere like France and say, ‘let’s have some of that over here.’ 

The price of Trudeau’s ideological indulgence will be paid for by future generations of Canadians; our children; grandchildren & great grandchildren, and it will be paid in blood. That is why this matters. Trudeau might seem to many like the happy decent sower of ‘diversity & strength’, but in reality he is a traitor to Canada’s future generations.

Trudeau follows the globalist model already established in Europe; one which the Democrats in the U.S. have been busy implementing during the 8 years of Obama.

This model requires that political parties that traditionally represented the interests of the working poor, abandon them in favour of ‘refugees’. To that end it requires the silencing of dissent, which provides a logical explanation for why we are now being subjected to ‘hate speech’ legislation: to silence the growing number who instinctively know that this is not in their interest.

Trudeau has one sound bite that sums up his mindset more than any other: “Our diversity is our strength” It’s a slogan he uses repeatedly, and upon scrutiny one which makes no sense unless we are talking about financial investments. Diversity is not strength, because it suggests the absence of cohesion & unity – something required for a successful societal model.

It sounds more like something he might have heard whilst watching Star Trek Voyager, and when you consider that, everything else that comes out of his mouth starts to make more sense.

Bannon: Winter Is Coming

Democratic Deep State Ramoras & Propaganda Media to face the White Walker

The departure of Steve Bannon from the White House last week was by far the most significant from the Trump team thus far. No one embodied the Trump victory or philosophy more than his cheif strategist.

Earlier on this year there had been speculation that Bannon had been sidelined during an internal power struggle between himself and chief advisor, Jared Kuschner & Ivanka Trump. If so, then more worringly for the Trump administration and its credibility, this would signal the compromising of his administration by the establishment forces he stood against last November.

Unlike many on the Alt-Right, we have always maintained that Trump is merely a figurehead for a larger movement. He is not a god and if he stops doing what got him elected, he will be discarded by those who put him there. The momentum is bigger than the man, and no one encapsulates the spirit of that movement more than Steve Bannon.

By far the most astute and revealing observations made thus far on the departure of Bannon from the Trump team came from Conservative commentator, Ben Shapiro.

Ben Shapiro: Steve Bannon Will Now Become a White Walker

Shapiro believes that Bannon will now become a White Walker; an angel of death destroying all before him; foes and former allies alike.

I feel jacked up. Now I’ve got my hands back on my weapons

Within hours of leaving the White House, Bannon declared:

“The Trump presidency that we fought for, and won, is over,” he told the Weekly Standard, a right-wing newspaper   “We still have a huge movement, and we will make something of this Trump presidency,” he continued.

“But that presidency is over. It’ll be something else. And there’ll be all kinds of fights, and there’ll be good days and bad days, but that presidency is over.”  

He added: “I feel jacked up. Now I’ve got my hands back on my weapons,” he added as he vowed “Bannon the barbarian” would crush the opposition.  

“There’s no doubt. I built a —–ng machine at Breitbart.  And now I’m about to go back, knowing what I know, and we’re about to rev that machine up. And rev it up we will do.”  Read Full Article

Much as it was a shocking disappointment to see Bannon leave the White House, it may well transpire that, free of the restrictive membership of government, and back in a comfortable role, Bannon will become a formidable foe to those who have assailed this presidency without mercy.

One of the options being considered by Bannon is the development of a television news network which will fill a niche being created to the right of Fox News.

Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon has told allies he hopes to expand Breitbart’s video capabilities, potentially even creating an alternate television network to rival Fox News.

Axios reported last week that Bannon has told friends that he sees an opportunity for a new network that could occupy an ideological space to the right of Fox News, an idea encouraged by ousted chairman and CEO Roger Ailes before his death earlier this year.

Read Full Article

Rather than seeing Bannon’s departure as a loss, we invite those faithful to the philosophy that got Trump elected to see his departure as a liberation of it’s greatest asset.

Bannon outside of the White House will immediately become a more amorphous and opaque target; he will be able to choose when and where he fights, and with which weapons. He will in short become a guerilla operative, using the tactics and skills the left has trademarked over the last 70 years against them.

The rules of engagement have changed since Charlottesville, and no one understands this, or is better prepared to lead the next phase of the war than Steve Bannon.

 

Charlottesville & Domestic Terrorism

In the wake of the Charlottesville violence and the attack involving a car being driven into a crowd of Antifa & BLM protesters, there have been calls for the groups involved in Saturday’s Unite The Right demonstration against the removal of the statue of General Lee in Charlottesville to be declared domestic terrorists.

The Case for Domestic Terrorism

As when Islamists use vehicles as weapons, any act of mass violence that is ideologically driven could be classed as domestic terrorism. However, in order to have the groups associated with the Unite The Right march, declared domestic terrorists, by that standard, those calling for such a move would have to accept Black Lives Matter & Antifa also being declared domestic terrorist organizations. Or risk exposing transparent bias and deteriorating the situation further into open civil war.

Black Lives Matter & Antifa: Domestic Terrorist Organizations

Both Black Lives Matter & Antifa have a well established history of using violence and intimidation to further their cause. Both groups have a track record of calling for dead cops; dead fascists etc. and the forcible silencing of voices they do not agree with. This side of Islamic terror, there are no better examples of domestic terror organizations in modern America than BLM & Antifa.

Antifa have been plying their trade as violent leftist street thugs all but unchallenged for the past year. All anyone had to do to be the focus of this violence was to turn up to speak at a university. People attending such events have been beaten unconscious; pepper sprayed; spat on and ultimately prevented from hearing the speaker, in contravention of their Constitutional right, by an organized group who exclusively use violence & intimidation to achieve their ideological goals.

ter·ror·ism
noun
 1. the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

Black Lives Matter also boasts an extensive body count to support their membership of this club. After openly calling for the death of police officers during demonstrations, adherents of the cause have ambushed and killed scored of U.S. police officers since. There seems little point at this stage arguing against their inclusion as a domestic terrorist organization. The only question really should be: why are they still operating?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H-9nDpk-Dc

Soros & the Democratic Party: Sponsors of Domestic Terrorism 

The one thing both groups have in common is that they are in receipt of financial support from George Soros, and the tacit support of both the mainstream media and Democratic party.

Soros is the main funder of some 200 leftist groups, including Planned Parenthood, MoveOn.org, and Black Lives Matter.

Soros also backs self-proclaimed antifascist groups—this year the Soros-backed group Alliance for Global Justice gave $50,000 to the militant thugs associated with the group Refuse Fascism. Read Full Article 

Whilst Black Lives Matter directly received $650 Million via Soros’ Open Society Foundation.

Hacked Documents show that Soros funded Black Lives Matter 

Democratic Party Terrorism

James Hodgkinson, the shooter of Republican House Majoiry Whip, Steve Scalise and three others, first identified and then shot the Republicans at a baseball game in Virginia earlier this year for no other reason their political affiliation to the Republican party. It was an ideologically driven act of mass violence (terrorism).

Hodgkinson was a supporter of Bernie Saunders. And whilst it would be unconvincing to lay the blame for that act of domestic terrorism on Sanders, it is not unreasonable to claim that the current culture of political violence was fermented & initiated by the Democratic Party – starting with the orchestration of violence at Trump rallies, which were planned & organized by Democratic Party operatives and paid for by George Soros.

James O’Keefe of Project Vertitas expose Democratic Party operatives orchestrating violence at Trump rallies.

Democratic leaders like Nancy Pelosi & Maxine Waters have not only consistently failed to denounce leftist violence against Trump and his supporters; they have infact poured fuel on such violence with their violent rhetoric. Likewise, when CNN describes a Black Lives Matter as ‘activists’, they legitimize the culture of violence the left currently enjoys.

The Democratic Party; George Soros & the liberal media are currently organizing; financing & legitimizing domestic terrorism in America.

If they are going to cast the domestic terrorism net and label right wing groups, ‘terrorist organizations’, the failure to include left wing groups with a much more convincing track record for the label, would do nothing but prepare the ground for a broader and expanding civil conflict.

Islamic Terror: Reaping the Whirlwind

So, up until this point those who find themselves steering the Islamic- Progressive alliance were under the impression that they could operate policies, within which, Islamic terrorists could mount an increasing number of terror attacks on the host society, whilst the guardians of the progressive narrative would deflect responsibility and maintain victim status for Muslims.

This new norm of accepting terror incidents as ‘part and parcel of living in a modern society’ suited both parties in their shared ultimate goal – the destruction of the traditional societal model. However, this model is not to be applied in the case of blowback from the target society.

Like the boiled frog, the domestic population were to be kept inactive by an ideologically subversive narrative and coercively silenced whilst the temperature of the water was slowly increased.

However, there comes a point where some of the frogs slowly being boiled realize what is happening and try to save themselves.

In 1942, British Air Chief Marshall, Arthur ‘Bomber’ Harris referenced a biblical quote (Hosea 8:7) when he made a radio broadcast to announce the RAF’s first thousand bomber raid on Germany.

“The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everybody else, and nobody was going to bomb them. After Rotterdam, London, Warsaw, and half a hundred other places, they have put that rather naive theory into operation. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind.”

Up until this one response to now countless Islamic terror attacks across Europe, the permitted response has been to employ hashtags; wash our profile pictures & offer instantly discardable thoughts and prayers.

Now there has been an attack on a group, who had until this point had been dolling out almost relentless violence, that response is suddenly no longer enough. Now we need to ‘crush the poison narrative’; we need sweeping laws to protect Muslims, so that they can continue to ideologically support extremists without interference or fear for their safety.

Today, Julie Lenarz in the relatively sober Telegraph argues that Failing to confront far-right terrorism will only embolden the other barbarians among us. Er, no Julie, confronting and tackling Islamic extremism is where we need to focus our energy. Scores of attacks across Europe, and we need to tackle the mindset behind one response? That is some perverse logic you’re afflicted with there.

There is no attempt to understand why something like this happened; no attempt to disassociate the actions of one from a broader group; no mercy in their words this morning for those they see has holding unacceptable views; views they clearly find more disturbing than the ideology behind the frequency of Islamic terror attacks we are now being asked to accept as ‘normal.’

Meanwhile, in the real world of actions and consequences, as if treating the host society to near relentless terror attacks was ever going to play out well for a group that makes up 5% of the population.

Not all Muslims are extremists or support such actions, but a significant minority believe things that are incompatible with a functioning liberal democracy.

I lived in Finsbury Park for many years. Finsbury Park mosque was notorious a hornet’s nest of extremism & then home to hate preacher, Abu Hamsa before his extradition to the U.S. on terror charges.

It was so infamous, that visiting football fans being escorted to the nearby Arsenal ground of Highbury would shout abuse at the intimidating group who would hold prayers on the pavement under the watchful eye of Hamsa.

Abu Hamsa leading prayers outside Finsbury Park mosque

It’s very hard to feel sorry for such people, and Finsbury Park mosque could be considered a high value target. However, the mosque that was attacked was across the street, so the suspicion is that the attacker confused the two.

London mayor Sadiq Khan & Labour’s Diane Abbott were declaring it a ‘terrorist attack’ within hours; something for which ideological motive needs to be present; something they were both very reluctant to do when the assailants were from the religion of special needs.

The speed with which they have declared intent and aportioned blame to Islamafauxbia should be noted. We would be very interested to know what sort of phobia Islamic terrorist suffer from. Of course, I am being disingenuous, Islamic terrorists are not treated to the same ideological vilification by the left.

None of this should come as any surprise. Once again we see the same alliance – Islam & the left sharing the same narrative; actively targeting any resistance to the now endless orgy of Islamic violence across Europe, and ultimately sharing the same goal: the undermining of structured and functioning Western societies.

‘As the traditions of the nation fade and lose meaning, so does its will to defend itself to survive’

W. August Mayer

Islamic Jihad, Cultural Marxism and the Transformation of the West

Camille Paglia on Trump, liberals, transgenders, and jihad

New interview with Camille Paglia in the Weekly Standard, in which she delves into the current derangement of our society and the media complicity thereof… plus why Trump won and will keep on winning as the Democrats keep on whining.

 

On Trump’s detractors:

There seems to be a huge conceptual gap between Trump and his most implacable critics on the left. Many highly educated, upper-middle-class Democrats regard themselves as exemplars of “compassion” (which they have elevated into a supreme political principle) and yet they routinely assail Trump voters as ignorant, callous hate-mongers. These elite Democrats occupy an amorphous meta-realm of subjective emotion, theoretical abstractions, and refined language. But Trump is by trade a builder who deals in the tangible, obdurate, objective world of physical materials, geometry, and construction projects, where communication often reverts to the brusque, coarse, high-impact level of pre-modern working-class life, whose daily locus was the barnyard. It’s no accident that bourgeois Victorians of the industrial era tried to purge “barnyard language” out of English.

 

On the the liberal non-reactions to jihadism:

Citizens have an absolute right to demand basic security from their government. The contortions to which so many liberals resort to avoid connecting bombings, massacres, persecutions, and cultural vandalism to Islamic jihadism is remarkable, given their usual animosity to religion, above all Christianity.

 

On transgenders:

I am highly skeptical about the current transgender wave, which I think has been produced by far more complicated psychological and sociological factors than current gender discourse allows. Furthermore, I condemn the escalating prescription of puberty blockers (whose long-term effects are unknown) for children. I regard this practice as a criminal violation of human rights.

… Biology has been programmatically excluded from women’s studies and gender studies programs for almost 50 years now. Thus very few current gender studies professors and theorists, here and abroad, are intellectually or scientifically prepared to teach their subjects.

 

Read the whole thing here.

Islamic Terror: Let Loose The Dogs of War

When I was about 11, there was a novel published entitled, The Churchill Commando. It was the late 1970’s, IRA terrorism was at its height and football violence had become engrained within the fabric of society.

When it was released, the Churchill Commando, which centred around the activities of a right wing death squad, was pawed with by the tabloid press as a fantasy panacea to the ills of the day.

The Churchill Commando by Ted Willis

As someone who lived in the U.K. through the full span of The Troubles as they became affectionately known, our current battle with Islamic terror is so much more serious and concerning. Because unlike the Irish nationalists, there is no political solution we can offer these people; nothing will satisfy them short of complete subjugation under an Islamic Caliphate. But also more worringly, Western societies no longer possess the resolve or means by which to defend themselves, never mind defeat such an enemy. Modern politicians and societies have been left ideological demoralized and all but defenceless due to decades of exposure to cultural Marxism.

Cultural Marxism has left us defenceless to Islam

In the 1970’s the British government fought a brutal and messy war against Republican terrorists both in Ireland and on the mainland. It was a protracted clandestine war of terror which included political assassinations; pub bombing; snipers and IED’s.

The British army operated an offensive front in N. Ireland via special forces units and through Unionist organizations such as the Ulster Voulenteer Force (UVF) & Ulster Defence Association (UDA). These units would be fed intelligence on Republican operatives & would be supplemented with army personnel, which would then target and assassinate active IRA members. For a number of years the British government also operate an internment policy, whereby nationalist operatives and activists could be detained on the basis of intelligence alone.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_zRX-F9Qt0

This is the sort of war we will need to fight against domestic Islamic extremism in order to defeat it and erradicate it from our societies. However, things have changed since the 1970’s; our societies are a perfect reflection of the hang-wringing cucked man-bitches they seem determined to produce, and so you have to wonder whether we are capable of winning such a fight?

An Enemy Within

It turns out that the Manchester Arena suicide bomber attended a radical local moque where his brother was a preacher; his dad was a fundraiser and Al Qaeda affiliate, and the family had just returned from a holiday to the jihadi playground formerly known as Libya. This family, who were first offered a home in Britain as they fled Gaddafi’s regime, not only betrayed every law of hospitality and gratitude, but they all should have been well on the radar of the security services.

Last night’s Islamic terror attack in South London, employed the more crude methods already hallmarked by ISIS operatives – vehicles and knives, but no doubt they will have been nurtured in communities that shared their ideology and received support from others not yet identified.

A recent ICM poll revealled that a staggering 66% of British Muslims would not inform the authorities of a terror plot. Which raises another issue: these bombers do not exist in isolation; statistics show that the communities they come from support them in alarming numbers on a series of issues associated with Islamic radicalization.

66% of British Muslims wouldn’t tell authorities about a terror plot. 

Why the ICM poll shows we need to defend our values more than ever.

These operatives, like any other military set up, are merely the business end supported by other extremists who share their ideology of intolerance and subjugation of host societies through violence.

Islam is rotten with violence, from the teachings and example set by the Prophet during his life, to the action of the South London attackers.

So we should not be surprised then these things happen. We have invited in a killer to dine with our family, whilst our politicians lie about the nature and intention of our guest.

Crossing The Rubicon

At this stage, a political will is required to defend & save our societies.

It’s either targeted hits, internment & deportation, as we saw in Northern Ireland in the 1970’s, or it’s Bosnia 2.0 for our children’s generation.

There is something galling about the prospect of sending your children to war to save the society of people who continue to support Islamic immigration despite all the evidence that it will eventually kill them.

Conversely, Islamists in Britain fail to appreciate how bad this could get for their communities very quickly. At approximately 4% of the population, any civil conflict is certain eradication. They are afforded a sense of immunity and safety by an ideologically imposed culture of seemingly infinate tolerance.

Just under the surface, however, is a tribal culture of brutality and a military wing that perfected paramilitary warfare during the 30 year war against the IRA. They know who they are, and they know where they live. That’s all they need. This is how business is done once you get to this level.

Theresa May now needs to let the dogs off the chain and give these guys a mauling, otherwise nationalist paramilitary warfare awaits.

Cultural Marxism Explained

Anyone who suggests that Cultural Marxism is a fabrication of the right, needs to see this film made in 1985, in which ex-KGB officer, Yuri Bezmenov details the strategy and methods behind what he describes as ‘Ideological Subversion.’

You have to wonder what Bezemov would make of the death spiral Western culture now finds itself in, with slut walks; gender pro nouns; race as a construct and ‘Islamaphobia.’

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8zJZDRwmEg

And whilst our Western liberal democracies are no longer capable of defending themselves due to the ideological rot which Cultural Marxism has spawned (a rot almost entirely epitomized by the world view of Canada’s Justin Trudeau), former Soviet Bloc European leaders have no problem identifying and resisting the utter lunacy of such thinking.

If Islamic terror attacks serve one purpose, it is to highlight what a pathetic specimen Western civilization has become after decades of cultural Marxism & political correctness have ground us down to a pith of emasculated self-loathing and insecurity.

The sum total of our permissible response to yet another attack from an enemy within, and whom we continue to welcome onto our shores in increasing numbers, is to wash our social media profile picture with the relevant flag and speak of our surprise & non-specific sadness at another act of predictable violence at the hands of an enemy whose name cannot be uttered.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BO7C_9xizk

For anyone outside of this paradigm, this borders upon a collective mental illness of cult proportions. Our inability to even identify the threat means that we have little chance of addressing it, and absolutely no chance of defeating it. Which in turn inevitably leads to a state of resignation, as we have to admit that after decades of dismantling our societies from within, cultural Marxism & political correctness have left our societies unable to respond, let alone defend a civilization that has been crafted with blood and reason over a thousand years to provide a societal model that others have sought to adopt and emulate.

It’s truly appalling what we have become, but it was by design, not accident.

Cultural Marxism Has Left Us Defenceless To Islam