First, in his book ‘Behold A Pale Horse‘ published in 1991, then on his radio program ‘The Hour of the Time‘ broadcast through out the 90’s until his death in 2001 just months before the shocking events of 9/11, an attack on America that he predicted on air, June 28, 2001.
Was he a prophet or just an educated man who saw the writing on the wall?
His belief was that the people have been deliberately taught lies in order to divide and control humanity and he spent his last years trying to warn us.
Among his warnings, was the assertion that a secret society of elites were working towards planetary dominance through war, famine, terrorism, debt, taxation and cultural division, with the aim of creating a single world government.
He described that Islam and the tyranny of Socialism would unite in battle against the west to destroy humanities remaining free people.
In what may be his most shocking and controversial revelation William Cooper describes not only that the Apollo Moon landings were hoaxed but that, (when the time was right) a false Alien invasion of earth would be created to unite the planet under a single army to combat the extra terrestrial threat and would ultimately lead to humanities enslavement.
Does all this sound crazy? Sure it does. That’s why no one would ever believe it but he has the research and military intelligence to form an interesting argument.
William Cooper was an expressed believer in God and taught that the elites who run the world were followers of Lucifer, Prometheus, the bringer of light and forbidden knowledge. The great deceiver who promises his disciples wisdom and wealth.
What would you do for ultimate power and glory? Would you start a war or murder an unborn baby? Would you destroy your town or city for an ideology? Would you demonize a person for believing in hard work and the right to own property? Would you vote for a known psychopath because they said nice things?
If we are not living in crazy days, then, the end times will surely be madness.
After Trump used his first speech as president to re-affirm his commitment to ‘wiperadical Islamic terror from the face of the planet’, liberals & the left lost their minds.
Which begs the obvious question: What aspect of Islamic extremism are you eager to retain or introduce?
Organizers of the protest marches planned for the day after also launched a series of ‘inclusive’ artworks which did nothing to dismantle or address this question.
Why are Western liberal women so reluctant to address or condemn the treatment of women in Islamic culture; a culture they are so eager to import?
You would be forgiven for thinking that some sections of society are no longer in the business of thinking things through; or are able to identify their best interests. That skill has been removed from them as they have been reduced to fake news modified emotional children triggered by political click bait.
The outpouring of instability, anger and grief over the inauguration of Donald Trump was a powerful pantomime performed by a cast of emotionally charged children clutching at flimsy motives. I mean, it wasn’t as if they hadn’t had time to get used to the idea, yet they sought this opportunity to indulge in a collective rage of epic embarrassment.
Interacting with anyone invested in this position has been like trying to interact with a traumatized child.
And heaven help you if you got in the way or answered invasive questioning incorrectly.
There seems little point engaging in discussion with such people at this stage. Their collective de-coupling from reality has rendered them unstable and unpredictable. The coercive narrative they have helped build and police over the past 30 years is crumbling, and they can’t blame themselves. That’s where you come in.
In a barren wilderness devoid of evidence connecting Russia to Trump’s election, I suppose you can say that thirst has driven the most desperate to drink piss.
This bizarre story emerged as part of a 35 page intelligence document, within which were some rather colourful and too-good-to-be-true accusations that Trump was a pervert and that Russia had this information and were using it to control him.
The dossier, which is a collection of memos written over a period of months, “includes specific, unverified and potentially unverifiable allegations of contact between Trump aides and Russian operatives, and graphic claims of sexual acts documented by the Russians” according to Buzzfeed.Read More
Later in the day, it was being reported that Trump had allegedly employed two Moscow prostitutes to piss on each other in a bed formerly used by the Obamas. Read More
At this point alarm bells should have been ringing for everyone – the scenario only existed as the creation of 4Chan activists, who originally fed the story to dupe anti-Trump Republicans. But under pressure to back up their allegations that Russia hacked the November U.S. election of Trump, and without any other credible evidence, it would seem that the thirst for these allegations to be true has driven not only John McCain, but also the CIA, CNN & Buzzfeed themselves to drink urine.
How 4Chan McFooled John McCain, Buzzfeed, and the CIA Into Believing Trump’s Golden Showers
I know this appears to be unbelievable, but it’s all verifiable. The neocon shill of a reporter from Buzzfeed, Rick Wilson, was catfished by some autist from the Hitler loving 4chan message boards and made to believe Trump enjoyed getting urinated on and all sorts of outlandish stuff. Truly, this is incredible. Read Full Article
Now, quite predictably, Buzzed & CNN are being accused of engaging in ‘Fake News’ by not only the Trump camp, but also none other than their former comrades in fake arms, the NYT. Full Story How much better can this get?
At this rate, the media execution squads are going to be working non-stop on January 21st.
What not to do case study #1, Madonna, who is pushing 60:
(No, the answer isn’t Photoshop. Photoshop is part of the problem.)
Camille Paglia writes at the Hollywood Reporter about Madonna’s “prolonged midlife crisis” that has her insisting on still dressing in outfits that would have been trampy for her in her early 80s heyday and shrilly screeching “misogyny” when men no longer find that sort of thing sexy.
Paglia helpfully suggests that maybe Madonna ought to look to the longevity of stars who have aged a little more gracefully (not to mention doing so without wearing any ass-exposing dresses), a stance for which the deluded feminazis will no doubt consider Paglia a traitor to her sex rather than, say, a sane person with functioning eyes and a sense of dignity.
If aging stars want to be taken seriously, they must find or recover a mature persona. Stop cannibalizing the young! Scrambling to stay relevant, Madonna is addicted to pointless provocations like her juvenile Instagrams or her trashy outfit with strapped-up bare buttocks and duct-taped nipples at the Metropolitan Museum of Art Gala in May. She has forgotten the legacy of her great precursor, Marlene Dietrich, who retained her class and style to the end of her public life.
If you’re wondering what that Met Gala atrocity looked like:
(Before you complain that that photo just made you vomit and/or lose your appetite: We know how tough it is to stick to diet-related New Year’s resolutions, so we’re just doing our part to help you keep yours. You’re welcome.)
As a palette cleanser, here’s Marlene Dietrich in her 60s:
Most disappointing about Madonna’s speech was her collapse into rote male-bashing, which has escalated in Hollywood and surely will increase its cultural isolation from the national audience. The young Madonna was refreshingly sane in her teasing affection for men. Top movie actresses once projected an emotional depth, composure and adult authority that can only be called womanliness. Ingrid Bergman, Susan Hayward, Elizabeth Taylor, Deborah Kerr and Sophia Loren were no victims: They’re strong-willed personalities — onscreen and off. But all of them liked men, and it showed.
We almost missed this late-December gem from David Cole over at Taki’s Magazine, all about the amusing parallels between people sneaking their pets into gay bars while pretending they’re service dogs and dudes wanting to sneak into women’s washrooms while pretending to be transsexuals and the laws that make it all OK whether people like it or not:
…She was direct in her response: “It was less likely anti-straight bias than it was all about the dog. Lots of queer bar owners hate the ADA because of the service-dog regulations.”
I was surprised. “But I thought gays loved their dogs…you know, pampering them, dressing them up in little hats and bow ties and shit.”
“Exactly,” my friend answered. “Queers are always trying to bring their non-service dogs into gay bars, and the owners and managers hate the ADA for the fact that it makes it almost impossible to turn them away. It’s a feeling of government intrusion; the owners feel like their right to run their own business is being violated by a law that demands access in the name of civil rights.”
LOL… oh that’s funny… maybe not for the average run-of-the-mill queer folks, but in light of their activist shit-disturbers, it’s hilariously obtuse. And Cole agrees:
Okay, this is rich. Gay club owners getting pissed off about federal laws mandating access in the name of civil rights. But here’s the thing: The gay bar owners have a point regarding service dogs and the ADA. The law is a hot mess of government illogic. Establishments are allowed to bar any dogs that are not “genuine” service animals (as opposed to simple pets or “emotional support animals”), but, and here comes government doing what it does best—crafting irrational and contradictory rules and regulations—establishments may not demand proof that a dog is a genuine service animal. In other words, you can ban non-service animals, but you are banned from asking for proof that an animal is a service animal; you have to take the customer’s word for it.
No one likes it when someone who won’t take the hint. As the collective murmurs enquiring as to why Barry isn’t busy packing his bag rise beyond a background hum, instead of preparing for handing over to a new commander in chief, Barry is frantically busy trying to start an 11th hour war with Russia and attempting to treat Trump’s election victory to a back street postpartum abortion.
I don’t think anyone can remember an incumbent president going to the lengths that Barry has to undermine the newly elected president. It’s truly appalling. Barry, pack your bags and fuck off. You’re like a child who won’t let go cos he insists it’s still his turn.
In the brave new world being forged for us, a new ideological reality is being created out of the dismembered parts of former great civilizations & cultures. And in this new reality, nothing is more dangerous than getting your information from non state-sanctioned sources.
The recent rejection of the tightening narrative during the Brexit referendum and U.S. election has shown that when people get their information from sources other than the state apparatus, results don’t turn out the way the elite wanted them to, and that then becomes a problem that needs addressing. And that’s where we are right now.
The fake vs real news debacle took a new and ludicrously contemptible twist this week when Facebook announced that it would be offering users the opportunity to flag what they considered ‘fake’ news.
That’s o.k. I hear you say, anytime I see a sponsored story from the already widely discredited Washington Post or New York Times, I will just flag it as fake news.
Sorry, you won’t be able to do that, because non of the state-sponsored fake news providers will be on the list. See how that works? Yes, only news services that oppose the state-sponsored narrative will be on the list.
But who will decide when something is guilty of being fake news? That’s a great question. The task has been given to state teet-sucking ABC & leftist Snopes, whose tagline ‘…rumour has it’, tells you everything about their journalistic credentials.
They have been awarded the contract for filtering out narrative challenging views in much the same way Halliburton were selected for filling tanks with gas during the Gulf War. Read More & More
We are now hurtling in on a point in time, probably in early January, when Barrack Obama addresses the nation to inform the public that all news is fake unless if has the CIA sticker on it.
In the meantime German Justice Minister, Heiko Maas has called for those who publish fake news to face fines & jail time.
With Facebook having announced last week the launch of measure to flag and eliminate fake news from appearing on its website, Germany does not think the process is fast enough, and according to Germany’s Justice Minister Heiko Maas, German judges and state prosecutors need to crack down straight away on fake news disseminated through social media platforms such as Facebook.Read More
How did we get here? I hear you say. How did we get from hope & yes we can, to no you can’t & don’t you dare?
Well, this is what happens when you are not engaged and paying attention. I know, you just want to be a good person; liked on social media; be one of the good people all swimming the same direction in the name of decency. Then bit by bit, as things accelerate, in order not to be one of the bad people, you are funnelled into thinking and accepting an ever narrowing set of ideological parameters; having to ignore awkward realities like the execution of people for being gay within cultures you can’t criticize; the invasion of Libya: for the best they said; he was a bad man. And then you are told that not wanting to surrender sovereignty to be part of unaccountable trading block makes you a racist, and hey, guess what? I know you liked Bernie, but he’s gone and we stiffed him, but if you support the bad man who said nasty things about a pussy and not the criminal embodiment of everything you were fighting against, you’re a terrible person and everyone will hate you because we will tell them to.
But people turned out to be more resilient, and they aren’t buying coercive narrative of transparent lies. Those that live closest to the effects of these policies are no longer interested in the shopping list of endless regime change and forced immigration it provides, and so they need to close down the sources of information that are feeding this growing independence of mind. That is where we are right now; everything is being brought to a head because they realize that the game is afoot.
Ah, beauty queens… empty-headed bimbos who pretend to have important opinions on the world ‘n’ stuff, but struggle to articulate sentiments like “I, um, think we should all get along and have world peace… plus I wanna be some foreign billionaire’s trophy ex-wife some day, so gimme the crown, OK?”
I mean, they’re all just one bender away from turning into the skanky second coming of Ke$ha, right?
Or, y’know, other realms within the entertainment industry, same difference, whatever…
So, yeah, beauty queens never have anything to say, right?
Right?
Well, usually.
But every so often, one of them actually does have something worthwhile to say. You’d think the pageant world would rejoice at that. You’d think that, but you’d be wrong… at least if the beauty queen in question is Miss World Canada’s Anastasia Lin (below), whose platform is all about human rights in general and the Chinese lack thereof in particular.
For some reason the powers that be at Miss World have a hair up their butts about Lin’s insistence on complaining about things like Chinese harvesting of organs from not-particularly-consenting political prisoners, and they’re doing everything in their power to keep her from making annoying comments on that sort of thing by keeping her away from media during the Miss World finals this year.
Which, by the way, happen to be in Washington, DC, and in theory might be assumed to be covered by that whole pesky free speech bullshit.
According to the New York Times:
The Miss World Organization has been aggressive in its effort to prevent reporters from speaking to Ms. Lin. Two weeks ago, pageant officials interrupted an interview she was giving to Jeff Jacoby, a Boston Globe columnist, in the lobby of a Washington-area hotel. “Two of them hustled Lin from the lobby, angrily accusing her of breaching the rules and causing trouble,” he wrote. “The third blocked me from talking to Lin, and assured me that my interview would be scheduled the next day. It wasn’t, of course.”
Dutch anti-Islam politician, Geert Wilders was found guilty of inciting racial discrimination on Friday for asking supporters if they wanted ‘fewer or more Moroccans’ in Holland, in what was the climax to a highly publicized case in Schiphol.
In court, the judge called his behaviour “unworthy” of a politician, and said there was no question that the case was political, as Wilders claimed.
The case, which has taken 20 months to reach a verdict, comes three months before Dutch general elections and Wilders’ PVV is currently leading in some polls.
Wilders quickly released a video message, in English and Dutch, slamming the judgment and vowing to appeal. “Today, I was convicted in a political trial which, shortly before the elections, attempts to neutralize the leader of the largest and most popular opposition party,” Wilders said. “They will not succeed.” Full Article
Wilders’ popularity has surged since the verdict, and if Brexit and Trump’s November victory are anything to go by, the next scalp could be the Netherlands’ progressive elite. Read More
The late Andrew Breitbart on his conservative awakening, false narratives and the war against cultural Marxism. An inspiring interview with the right wing media guerrilla, and architect of Trump’s 2016 election victory.
Over at Taki’s Magazine, Gavin McInnes gives his take on the war on “fake news”:
Later [Obama] complained to Rolling Stone that we are getting information from “completely different sources.” That’s right. The least competent president in history is telling rape hoax central the merits of the DNC handling all the information from here on out. Barack is ultimately calling for the abolition of facts and suggesting America take up some kind of state-run media the way Britain and Canada have.
Right, because that’s worked out so awesomely for Canada and the UK… as McInnes elaborates on. Read the whole thing here.
PS: What is real “fake news”? Well, there’s two kinds.
1. Quoth McInnes: “as far as a literal definition, I assume it’s those cheap-looking WordPress sites where you can tell it was made by a mentally ill divorced man who hates the world.”
2. The same thing, only made by mentally ill divorced women who hate the world, minus the cheap-looking WordPress site, plus big budgets and paycheques signed by the likes of Ted Turner (if you live in the USA) and/or your friendly local tax collectors (if you live in Canada or the UK).
Aristotle's Bench Press 