CIA Reduced to Drinking Urine

4503e7508bea4de6a6e57ef78b37caf0

In a barren wilderness devoid of evidence connecting Russia to Trump’s election, I suppose you can say that thirst has driven the most desperate to drink piss.

This bizarre story emerged as part of a 35 page intelligence document, within which were some rather colourful and too-good-to-be-true accusations that Trump was a pervert and that Russia had this information and were using it to control him.

The dossier, which is a collection of memos written over a period of months, “includes specific, unverified and potentially unverifiable allegations of contact between Trump aides and Russian operatives, and graphic claims of sexual acts documented by the Russians” according to Buzzfeed.  Read More

Later in the day, it was being reported that Trump had allegedly employed two Moscow prostitutes to piss on each other in a bed formerly used by the Obamas. Read More

At this point alarm bells should have been ringing for everyone – the scenario only existed as the creation of 4Chan activists, who originally fed the story to dupe anti-Trump Republicans. But under pressure to back up their allegations that Russia hacked the November U.S. election of Trump, and without any other credible evidence, it would seem that the thirst for these allegations to be true has driven not only John McCain, but also the CIA, CNN & Buzzfeed themselves to drink urine.

15844656_10154692003810469_5309369773887992933_o

 

15941137_1010316432401632_2668579331155148022_n

How 4Chan McFooled John McCain, Buzzfeed, and the CIA Into Believing Trump’s Golden Showers

I know this appears to be unbelievable, but it’s all verifiable. The neocon shill of a reporter from Buzzfeed, Rick Wilson, was catfished by some autist from the Hitler loving 4chan message boards and made to believe Trump enjoyed getting urinated on and all sorts of outlandish stuff. Truly, this is incredible.  Read Full Article

screen-shot-2017-01-11-at-8-56-17-am

Now, quite predictably, Buzzed & CNN are being accused of engaging in ‘Fake News’ by not only the Trump camp, but also none other than their former comrades in fake arms, the NYT. Full Story How much better can this get?

At this rate, the media execution squads are going to be working non-stop on January 21st.

 

How to not look like a desperate old Hollywood THOT

What not to do case study #1, Madonna, who is pushing 60:

madonna-photoshop

(No, the answer isn’t Photoshop. Photoshop is part of the problem.)

Camille Paglia writes at the Hollywood Reporter about Madonna’s “prolonged midlife crisis” that has her insisting on still dressing in outfits that would have been trampy for her in her early 80s heyday and shrilly screeching “misogyny” when men no longer find that sort of thing sexy.

Paglia helpfully suggests that maybe Madonna ought to look to the longevity of stars who have aged a little more gracefully (not to mention doing so without wearing any ass-exposing dresses), a stance for which the deluded feminazis will no doubt consider Paglia a traitor to her sex rather than, say, a sane person with functioning eyes and a sense of dignity.

If aging stars want to be taken seriously, they must find or recover a mature persona. Stop cannibalizing the young! Scrambling to stay relevant, Madonna is addicted to pointless provocations like her juvenile Instagrams or her trashy outfit with strapped-up bare buttocks and duct-taped nipples at the Metropolitan Museum of Art Gala in May. She has forgotten the legacy of her great precursor, Marlene Dietrich, who retained her class and style to the end of her public life.

If you’re wondering what that Met Gala atrocity looked like:

madonna-met-gala-best-dressed-ftr

(Before you complain that that photo just made you vomit and/or lose your appetite: We know how tough it is to stick to diet-related New Year’s resolutions, so we’re just doing our part to help you keep yours. You’re welcome.)

As a palette cleanser, here’s Marlene Dietrich in her 60s:

marlene-dietrich-1960s

(Plus an interview with Marlene from the same era, in which she’s far saner than Madonna about the whole myth of the sex goddess thing.)

Anyway, Camille continues:

Most disappointing about Madonna’s speech was her collapse into rote male-bashing, which has escalated in Hollywood and surely will increase its cultural isolation from the national audience. The young Madonna was refreshingly sane in her teasing affection for men. Top movie actresses once projected an emotional depth, composure and adult authority that can only be called womanliness. Ingrid Bergman, Susan Hayward, Elizabeth Taylor, Deborah Kerr and Sophia Loren were no victims: They’re strong-willed personalities — onscreen and off. But all of them liked men, and it showed.

Read the rest here.

A service dog walks into a gay bar…

gay-dog-play

Wait, no… wrong gay dog pic… more like this:

gay-poodle

Or this:

dog-with-dildo

Anyway…

We almost missed this late-December gem from David Cole over at Taki’s Magazine, all about the amusing parallels between people sneaking their pets into gay bars while pretending they’re service dogs and dudes wanting to sneak into women’s washrooms while pretending to be transsexuals and the laws that make it all OK whether people like it or not:

…She was direct in her response: “It was less likely anti-straight bias than it was all about the dog. Lots of queer bar owners hate the ADA because of the service-dog regulations.”

I was surprised. “But I thought gays loved their dogs…you know, pampering them, dressing them up in little hats and bow ties and shit.”

“Exactly,” my friend answered. “Queers are always trying to bring their non-service dogs into gay bars, and the owners and managers hate the ADA for the fact that it makes it almost impossible to turn them away. It’s a feeling of government intrusion; the owners feel like their right to run their own business is being violated by a law that demands access in the name of civil rights.”

LOL… oh that’s funny… maybe not for the average run-of-the-mill queer folks, but in light of their activist shit-disturbers, it’s hilariously obtuse. And Cole agrees:

Okay, this is rich. Gay club owners getting pissed off about federal laws mandating access in the name of civil rights. But here’s the thing: The gay bar owners have a point regarding service dogs and the ADA. The law is a hot mess of government illogic. Establishments are allowed to bar any dogs that are not “genuine” service animals (as opposed to simple pets or “emotional support animals”), but, and here comes government doing what it does best—crafting irrational and contradictory rules and regulations—establishments may not demand proof that a dog is a genuine service animal. In other words, you can ban non-service animals, but you are banned from asking for proof that an animal is a service animal; you have to take the customer’s word for it.

Gee, that sounds kinda familiar, doesn’t it?

Read the whole thing here.

Obama: CIA & Salon Are The Real News.

o-barack-obama-facebook

No one likes it when someone who won’t take the hint. As the collective murmurs enquiring as to why Barry isn’t busy packing his bag rise beyond a background hum, instead of preparing for handing over to a new commander in chief, Barry is frantically busy trying to start an 11th hour war with Russia and attempting to treat Trump’s election victory to a back street postpartum abortion.

I don’t think anyone can remember an incumbent president going to the lengths that Barry has to undermine the newly elected president. It’s truly appalling. Barry, pack your bags and fuck off. You’re like a child who won’t let go cos he insists it’s still his turn.

In the brave new world being forged for us, a new ideological reality is being created out of the dismembered parts of former great civilizations & cultures. And in this new reality, nothing is more dangerous than getting your information from non state-sanctioned sources.

The recent rejection of the tightening narrative during the Brexit referendum and U.S. election has shown that when people get their information from sources other than the state apparatus, results don’t turn out the way the elite wanted them to, and that then becomes a problem that needs addressing. And that’s where we are right now.

cia-agents-trolling-alternative-media-632x350

The fake vs real news debacle took a new and ludicrously contemptible twist this week when Facebook announced that it would be offering users the opportunity to flag what they considered ‘fake’ news.

That’s o.k. I hear you say, anytime I see a sponsored story from the already widely discredited Washington Post or New York Times, I will just flag it as fake news.

Sorry, you won’t be able to do that, because non of the state-sponsored fake news providers will be on the list. See how that works? Yes, only news services that oppose the state-sponsored narrative will be on the list.

But who will decide when something is guilty of being fake news? That’s a great question. The task has been given to state teet-sucking ABC & leftist Snopes, whose tagline ‘…rumour has it’, tells you everything about their journalistic credentials.

They have been awarded the contract for filtering out narrative challenging views in much the same way Halliburton were selected for filling tanks with gas during the Gulf War. Read More & More

We are now hurtling in on a point in time, probably in early January, when Barrack Obama addresses the nation to inform the public that all news is fake unless if has the CIA sticker on it.

In the meantime German Justice Minister, Heiko Maas has called for those who publish fake news to face fines & jail time.

With Facebook having announced last week the launch of measure to flag and eliminate fake news from appearing on its website, Germany does not think the process is fast enough, and according to Germany’s Justice Minister Heiko Maas, German judges and state prosecutors need to crack down straight away on fake news disseminated through social media platforms such as Facebook. Read More

How did we get here? I hear you say. How did we get from hope & yes we can, to no you can’t & don’t you dare?

Well, this is what happens when you are not engaged and paying attention. I know, you just want to be a good person; liked on social media; be one of the good people all swimming the same direction in the name of decency. Then bit by bit, as things accelerate, in order not to be one of the bad people, you are funnelled into thinking and accepting an ever narrowing set of ideological parameters; having to ignore awkward realities like the execution of people for being gay within cultures you can’t criticize; the invasion of Libya: for the best they said; he was a bad man. And then you are told that not wanting to surrender sovereignty to be part of unaccountable trading block makes you a racist, and hey, guess what? I know you liked Bernie, but he’s gone and we stiffed him, but if you support the bad man who said nasty things about a pussy and not the criminal embodiment of everything you were fighting against, you’re a terrible person and everyone will hate you because we will tell them to.

But people turned out to be more resilient, and they aren’t buying coercive narrative of transparent lies. Those that live closest to the effects of these policies are no longer interested in the shopping list of endless regime change and forced immigration it provides, and so they need to close down the sources of information that are feeding this growing independence of mind. That is where we are right now; everything is being brought to a head because they realize that the game is afoot.

Miss World muzzles Miss Canada’s human rights concerns

miss-teen-south-carolina-2007-meme

Ah, beauty queens… empty-headed bimbos who pretend to have important opinions on the world ‘n’ stuff, but struggle to articulate sentiments like “I, um, think we should all get along and have world peace… plus I wanna be some foreign billionaire’s trophy ex-wife some day, so gimme the crown, OK?”

gold-digger

I mean, they’re all just one bender away from turning into the skanky second coming of Ke$ha, right?

kesha_-_tik_tok

Or, y’know, other realms within the entertainment industry, same difference, whatever…

porn

So, yeah, beauty queens never have anything to say, right?

capital-of-texas

Right?

Well, usually.

But every so often, one of them actually does have something worthwhile to say. You’d think the pageant world would rejoice at that. You’d think that, but you’d be wrong… at least if the beauty queen in question is Miss World Canada’s Anastasia Lin (below), whose platform is all about human rights in general and the Chinese lack thereof in particular.

anastasia-lin-miss-world-canada

For some reason the powers that be at Miss World have a hair up their butts about Lin’s insistence on complaining about things like Chinese harvesting of organs from not-particularly-consenting political prisoners, and they’re doing everything in their power to keep her from making annoying comments on that sort of thing by keeping her away from media during the Miss World finals this year.

Which, by the way, happen to be in Washington, DC, and in theory might be assumed to be covered by that whole pesky free speech bullshit.

According to the New York Times:

The Miss World Organization has been aggressive in its effort to prevent reporters from speaking to Ms. Lin. Two weeks ago, pageant officials interrupted an interview she was giving to Jeff Jacoby, a Boston Globe columnist, in the lobby of a Washington-area hotel. “Two of them hustled Lin from the lobby, angrily accusing her of breaching the rules and causing trouble,” he wrote. “The third blocked me from talking to Lin, and assured me that my interview would be scheduled the next day. It wasn’t, of course.”

Read more here.

More information on allegations and oddities related to China’s organ transplant trade.

Europe: A Progressive Dictatorship

Dutch anti-Islam politician, Geert Wilders was found guilty of inciting racial discrimination on Friday for asking supporters if they wanted ‘fewer or more Moroccans’ in Holland, in what was the climax to a highly publicized case in Schiphol.

In court, the judge called his behaviour “unworthy” of a politician, and said there was no question that the case was political, as Wilders claimed.

The case, which has taken 20 months to reach a verdict, comes three months before Dutch general elections and Wilders’ PVV is currently leading in some polls.

Read More

Wilders quickly released a video message, in English and Dutch, slamming the judgment and vowing to appeal. “Today, I was convicted in a political trial which, shortly before the elections, attempts to neutralize the leader of the largest and most popular opposition party,” Wilders said. “They will not succeed.”  Full Article

Wilders’ popularity has surged since the verdict, and if Brexit and Trump’s November victory are anything to go by, the next scalp could be the Netherlands’ progressive elite.  Read More

 

Gavin McInnes on “Fake News”

fake-news

Over at Taki’s Magazine, Gavin McInnes gives his take on the war on “fake news”:

Later [Obama] complained to Rolling Stone that we are getting information from “completely different sources.” That’s right. The least competent president in history is telling rape hoax central the merits of the DNC handling all the information from here on out. Barack is ultimately calling for the abolition of facts and suggesting America take up some kind of state-run media the way Britain and Canada have.

Right, because that’s worked out so awesomely for Canada and the UK… as McInnes elaborates on. Read the whole thing here.

PS: What is real “fake news”? Well, there’s two kinds.

1. Quoth McInnes: “as far as a literal definition, I assume it’s those cheap-looking WordPress sites where you can tell it was made by a mentally ill divorced man who hates the world.”

2. The same thing, only made by mentally ill divorced women who hate the world, minus the cheap-looking WordPress site, plus big budgets and paycheques signed by the likes of Ted Turner (if you live in the USA) and/or your friendly local tax collectors (if you live in Canada or the UK).

Fake News Vs Real News

15073306_959682797464996_805136256413789041_n

By this stage, the battle between those who claim to offer the real news, and those who are accused of being fake news providers, has surpassed the ridiculous and has now settled into a period of prolonged & bitter trench warfare.

As ZeroHedge reports today, the state apparatus and their errand boys of misinformation have been doubling down on their attempts to have independent sources that do not share their narrative branded ‘Russian propaganda’ and closed down.

As the “fake news” narrative grows, and The House quietly passes a bill to “counter Russian propoganda” websites, one alleged ‘fake’ news wesbite – as defined by the farcical PropOrNot organization – has struck back. Naked Capitalism’s Yves Smith has threatened The Washington Post with a defamation suit and demanded a retraction. Read More

By this stage, if the propaganda is not embarrassingly transparent & revealing, you need to worry about what long term exposure to state sponsored information has done to your independence of mind.

So what are the fake news sites that the voice of truth speaks of? Well, this all began when the the LA Times provided space for a piece by Assistant Professor of Communications at Merrimack College, Melissa “Mish” Zimdars

Notice that while the list includes numerous conservative news sources like Breitbart, Infowars, Twitchy, The Blaze and Bizpac Review, it excludes the beacon of impartiality known as The Huffington Post.

Zero Hedge Targeted On Liberal Professor’s List of “Fake News” Sources

Then, not to be outdone, or rather, next in line came the Washington Post, a publication so comprehensively without professional credibility, that it makes the NYT look better.

Washington Post Names Drudge, Zero Hedge, & Ron Paul As Anti-Clinton “Sophisticated Russian Propaganda Tools”

Ironically, and somewhat predictably, fake news sites are the sources that chose to publish the Wikileaks disclosures (also a fake news site btw), whilst CNN were providing blanket coverage to Trump’s Pussygate for a solid week, and the likes of the WaPo & NYT were busy pumping the prescribed narrative into everyone’s lap like the good little propagandists they are.

Not surprisingly, Project Veritas also made the list for their undercover expose of DNC orchestration of violence at Trump rallies and organized voter fraud – another huge revelation.

Here’s a snapshot of just some of the sites listed as fake.

screen-shot-2016-12-05-at-10-12-35-am

Sites like Info Wars & Zerohedge, who in April 2016, ran Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, Seymour Hersh’s story about how the Obama administration knew where Bin Laden was all along, and that the Saudi’s had been paying Pakistan in oil to keep him out of the way since 2001. This was a huge story that no major U.S. news network would touch, and so it was left to fake news sites like Info Wars & Zero Hedge to provide the public with what should have been the biggest story of the year.  More Details

The list even includes Ben Shapiro’s Daily Wire. Anyone who is familiar with Shapiro and the Daily Wire will appreciate how ridiculous that is.

This from Shapiro on the Daily Wire:

The Media Lost The Election 

Now the media is exposed in front of the whole world as a Swaggering Potemkin Bully that no longer has the power to sway public opinion, even when they throw absolutely everything they have at one man, and do so with much of the Republican Party on their side.

Not only has the media forever been exposed as brazenly dishonest and laughably out of touch, worse than all that, they are exposed as WEAK, a force no one need ever fear or kowtow to again.  Read More

By now, anyone unfamiliar with this ongoing story, should be coming to the realization that the ‘fake’ news sites listed, were ironically, the only sources that could be relied upon for information whilst every one else engaged in an orgy of propaganda.

And the Real news? Well, those would be the CIA / Illuminati sources that Trump invited last week, for what was described as a ‘fucking firing squad’ of a meeting.

Full Details

The government fed and officially sanctioned news outlets like the NYT; ABC; CNN et al, who attempted to mislead the U.S. population into believing, I mean got it wrong that Hillary was the favourite and maintained this projected reality, until they were forced to face reality with the loss of Florida & Wisconsin.

screen-shot-2016-11-09-at-10-56-25-am

Propaganda so heavily and carelessly conducted, and so transparently received,  that the NYT took the unusual step post-election of throwing itself on the mercy of public and begging for forgiveness.

In a letter from its owner and executive editor, the New York Times, a biased media outlet which together with the rest of the liberal press misreported on the presidential race – whether due to conflicts of interest or due to sheer stupidity – from day one, leading to such idiotic forecasts as an 86% probability for Hillary to win as recently as one week ago, Arthur Sulzberger, the owner and publisher of the NYT, promised that the paper would “reflect” on its coverage of this year’s election, as it “rededicates” itself to reporting on “America and the world” honestly.

Read More & More

screen-shot-2016-11-27-at-2-40-32-pm

The idea that sources such as Zero Hedge are ‘fake news’ when you have the NYT begging for forgiveness after the appalling propaganda the MSM engaged in during the election, speaks more to their fear and utter bankruptcy when it comes to continued operation and credibility.

Less Than 1 In 3 Trust Mainstream Media, Martin Armstrong Warns “Their End Is Near”

Gallup, which began recording public trust in the U.S. media back in 1972, reports that, following 2005, the trust in mainstream media dropped into the mid 40% range. It has consistently been below a majority level ever since the 2007 economic decline. However, after the 2016 election and the extreme bias for Hillary, where virtually 99% of mainstream media deliberately tried to manipulate the people to vote for Hillary, the trust factor has collapsed to 32%. When they polled just conservative Republicans, it was 14%. So the 32% level is the average American.

It couldn’t happen happen to more transparent propagandists. Their days are numbered and they’re feeling the fear.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlK81oJX9Vk

 

Is Justin Trudeau Castro’s Child?

15228070_10101588470840221_844563917_n

Oh Canada, what have you done? We always maintained that liberals could not be trusted with anything more important than warming milk, but now we fear that liberals in Canada may have elected none other than Fidel Castro’s son.

15281033_10101588469323261_897636356_n

15226607_10101588476793291_1793563671_n

You have to admit the similarity is disturbing, and it also goes some way to explain Trudeau’s comments regarding the recently deceased Cuban leader in an official statement, which lacked any sort of criticism of the Cuban regime, or leader.

“It is with deep sorrow that I learned today of the death of Cuba’s longest serving President.

“Fidel Castro was a larger than life leader who served his people for almost half a century. A legendary revolutionary and orator, Mr. Castro made significant improvements to the education and healthcare of his island nation.

“While a controversial figure, both Mr. Castro’s supporters and detractors recognized his tremendous dedication and love for the Cuban people who had a deep and lasting affection for “el Comandante”.

“I know my father was very proud to call him a friend and I had the opportunity to meet Fidel when my father passed away. It was also a real honour to meet his three sons and his brother President Raúl Castro during my recent visit to Cuba.

“On behalf of all Canadians, Sophie and I offer our deepest condolences to the family, friends and many, many supporters of Mr. Castro. We join the people of Cuba today in mourning the loss of this remarkable leader.”